Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Youngest (tie): American Dad; Family Guy (29)
by fiester
Jun 30th, 2008
01:31:45 AM
Ka-ching!
Here comes Juno: the show
by The Guy Who Slept Through Everything.
Jun 30th, 2008
01:51:49 AM
Watch as she gets knocked up every week on the N network.
Confirming what we already know
by Badger23
Jun 30th, 2008
01:52:25 AM
CBS has the oldest effing shrivs watching.
Gayest: this article. Non-Gayest: people who post here
by Heckles
Jun 30th, 2008
01:59:04 AM
Yeah, that's how it works.
Now it's official
by CZ
Jun 30th, 2008
02:33:50 AM
Looks like me and the roomie are the last twenty-something viewers of "60 Minutes." I shudder to think what the average age of "Frontline" or "Charlie Rose" viewers must be.
Teens getting pregnant?!
by magic_ninja
Jun 30th, 2008
02:49:45 AM
Oh, that's right, before this "Virgin Cult" bullshit no teenage girl ever got knocked up except in crappy movies like Juno, right?
the average One Tree Hill viewer is 26?
by newc0253
Jun 30th, 2008
03:20:05 AM
and here i figured once you passed the quarter-century mark, there were less excuses for being completely fucking retarded.

i'm also a little disturbed how old the Scrubs viewing audience skews. 34? that would explain all the baby storylines these days.

I'm pretty sure young people download it.
by David Cloverfield
Jun 30th, 2008
03:27:11 AM
why would they fuck around with commercials and schedules?
I would love to see
by ThrowMeTheIdol
Jun 30th, 2008
03:41:03 AM
a list of the average ages of all major shows. I'm really curious about the age of 30 Rock, Office, Lost fans, among others.
Newsflash: Variety Caught Using Word 'Show'
by smackfu
Jun 30th, 2008
04:43:26 AM
Have they given up their pathetic 5-year long campaign to popularize the word 'skein' as the hip, cool new word meaning 'tv show'? More at 11.
Average Family Guy watcher is 29!??!!??!?!
by A G
Jun 30th, 2008
04:56:16 AM
HOLY SHIT. Family Guy is AWFUL, I'm shocked.
I wish they would market to the older generation
by romanocc
Jun 30th, 2008
05:21:52 AM
I hate the fact that movies and TV and even sports markets to the teenager/early 20 year old. They dumb it down, they try to wow them, instead of just putting out a great product.
magic_ninja
by romanocc
Jun 30th, 2008
05:24:23 AM
What he is talking about teens getting pregnant is in Massachussets, where 17 girls in one school got knocked, supposedly cause they made a pact to all do it, cause it was 'cool.' I remember we had 1-2 girls who got pregnant and would 'disappear' for 9 months, but 17 teenage girls? The Ipod/Internet generation are bunch of fucking spoiled brats who are going to have a rude awakening when they are on their own and have to move out of their parents house.
Cool. So they probably start making good TV again...
by DerLanghaarige
Jun 30th, 2008
05:56:24 AM
...instead of worthless stuff that they can sell to dumb teenagers.
Or not. While I'm typing it i realized that the argument didn't make sense, because the shit-shows are successfull anyway, even if the viewers are older than expected.
Yeah, that phrase makes my skein crawl
by rosasaks
Jun 30th, 2008
06:04:51 AM
"Key 18 to 49 demographic" my ass!
60 Minutes
by ElPaw
Jun 30th, 2008
06:19:23 AM
Are these 60 year olds not coping with their eye hernias and reading "60 minutes" as "60 years"?
"Slanguage"
by rosasaks
Jun 30th, 2008
06:22:55 AM
(This article originally appeared in Verbatim, Vol. XXX, No. 1, Spring 2005.)

Those who for the first time open up Daily Variety, the trade paper of Hollywood and the American entertainment industry, are often baffled and stymied by the paper’s use of language. Take, for example, this headline, “‘KING’ NIPS SHIP WITH 11 NOMS” (28 Jan 2004, p. 24). To most the headline is unintelligible, but to those familiar with Variety it is announcing that the movie ‘Return of the King’ beat out ‘Master and Commander’ with eleven Academy Award nominations. Another example is the opening line of an article that appears in the 11 February 2004 issue, “A hefty writedown at Blockbuster knocked Viacom into the red last quarter despite a strong perf at those true-blue cable nets and strides at Paramount, where prexy Mel Karmazin praised the 2004 pic slate.” Variety employs a number of grammatical tricks and jargon terms, which it dubs “slanguage,” to achieve its distinctive style.

This style achieves two main objectives. Like all jargon, it creates the sense of an “in crowd.” It seeks to exclude those outside the industry and puff up the Texas-sized egos of those in Hollywood. It also enlivens up what could be a rather dull subject. Sure Hollywood is all about celebrity and glamour, but Variety is not. Variety is a business paper, concerned with contracts and deals, profit and loss. The inventive use of language spices up the subject matter and combines the tone of a gossip column with the subject of a business journal.

Variety began publication in 1905, founded by Simon J. “Sime” Silverman, a gambler and general ne’er-do-well, with a $2,500 loan from his father. Silverman went into the news business with the motto, “bury the puff and give me the fact.” Silverman may have eschewed “puff,” but from the beginning Variety used a distinctive, slangy style. In 1933, the paper became a daily and changed its name to Daily Variety. On 17 July 1935, the paper published the most famous instance of its slanguage, “Sticks Nix Hick Pix,” a headline for an article about rural audiences rejecting a film about rural life.

Variety’s style comprises three major techniques. The paper likes to use plays on words and rhymes, especially in headlines and the opening paragraphs of articles. Some examples: “Start spreading the news: CBS is launching a third ‘CSI’ to be based in Gotham” (16 Jan 2004, p. 1); “It’s official: J.Fo will pair with J.Lo” (16 Jan 2004, p. 5, a reference to Jane Fonda and Jennifer Lopez); and “ABC latenight host Jimmy Kimmel has snagged a silver bullet—Coors Light” (16 Jan 2004, p. 14).

Other examples include the headline “A WING-DING FOR ‘THE KING’” and the sentence “‘King’ has zing,” references to the movie “Return of the King” (28 Jan 2004, p. 1). “Disney gloves Gallic pitch” (28 Jan 2004, p. 5) uses baseball imagery to headline an article about Disney obtaining the rights to a story idea, or pitch. “FIRMS CRASH ‘DANCE” (16 Jan 2004, p. 5) is a headline about corporations sponsoring the Sundance independent film festival. And ‘Nip/Tuck,’ a TV drama about plastic surgeons, earns this headline about its success in Britain, “FX’s ‘Nip’ firms up Sky’s flabby ratings” (15 Jan 2004, p. 13).

A second technique is to omit “a,” “an,” and “the,” especially at the beginning of sentences. This gives Variety’s articles a staccato, rapid pace that fits well with the fast-paced and ever-changing aura of Hollywood. Two examples: “Pic is being readied for a 2005 holiday release” and “Project comes from Touchstone TV and Gibson’s Icon Prods” (28 Jan 2004, p. 5).

The last and largest element in Variety’s style is the jargon or slang that it employs. The paper deploys a bewildering array of jargon terms without explanation or aid to the neophyte reader.

The inventive nature of Variety’s slang is well documented. The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, includes some twenty-odd entries whose initial citations are from the magazine. These include: boffo (12 May 1943); fave, a clipping of favorite (16 Mar 1938); featurette (28 Jan 1942); Grammy, the musical award (30 Sep 1959); juve, a youth (17 Apr 1935); kitchenette (7 May 1910); nabe, a clipping of neighborhood (14 Feb 1933); nance, an effeminate or gay man (6 Aug 1910); nite (13 Jan 1928); payola (19 Oct 1938); pix (19 Jul 1932); punch line (25 Nov 1921); shim, a blend of she and him, meaning a transvestite or transsexual (19 Feb 1975); shoot-‘em-up (11 Feb 1953); small time (30 Apr 1910); strip and tease (1 Oct 1930), strip teaser (26 Nov 1930), and strip tease (2 Dec 1936); the use of wow as a verb (24 Dec 1924); and, quite aptly, show biz (13 Jun 1945).

But Variety’s slanguage goes well beyond these terms that have made their way into the general vocabulary of the nation. Daily, it uses arcane jargon terms both from the entertainment industry and unique to the paper itself. The meanings of some of these terms are often not immediately obvious to the casual reader. One such is the verb to ankle to mean to quit or leave; “a successful guest-hosting stint on Jack Benny’s radio show led to an offer to host ‘The Tonight Show’ when the show’s first host, Steve Allen, ankled” (28 Jan 2004, p. 2). Another Variety verb is to pact, meaning to sign a contract; “the studio has already pacted with NBC for a drama series” (16 Sep 2003, p. 1). There is also to front, meaning to host; “way out ahead of the game is ‘American Idol’ host Ryan Seacrest, fronting a gabber that began Monday” (16 Jan 2004, p. 38). The paper’s slanguage is not limited to verbs. The adjective legit is used to denote live theater, after the phrase the legitimate theater; “Schumacher described what they wanted in their legit Poppins” (28 Jan 2004, p. 14). The paper even carries a regular column reviewing the stage titled “Legit Review.”

Other terms in Variety’s slanguage are more obvious. Famous people are celebs, most of whom seek to topline, or star in, a movie or show; “Bernsen [...] has tapped ‘General Hospital’ star Kim Shriner to topline the pic” (6 Feb 2004, p. 11). A film is a pic, plural pix, and a performance is a perf. The verb says is often spelled sez; “Robert Vaughn sez they were shooting the ‘Hustler’ series” (16 Sep 2003, p. 4). Business becomes biz and the biz is, of course, show business. Femme is used as both an adjective and a noun for female; “‘Heart’ will revolve around the femme lead coming to a Los Angeles performing arts academy” (16 Jan 2004, p. 7); “‘Reba,’ [...] was strongest among femmes 12-34 (2.3/9), placing third for the hour” (16 Sep 2003, p. 6). And terrific is clipped to terrif; “The New Line toppers told me they’ve received terrif test screenings of ‘The Lord of the Rings’” (16 Sep 2003, p. 4).

Other clippings include names for entertainment centers in Los Angeles and New York. Hollywood becomes H’w’d and Beverly Hills is BevHills. Similarly, on the East Coast, Broadway becomes B’way and New York is known as Gotham; “the harried homemaker’s federal trial in Gotham” (28 Jan 2004, p. 6).

To Be Continued...

Film genres have their own Variety names. Action movies are actioners; “Warner Bros. unspools Ice Cube actioner ‘Torque’ in 2,463 theaters” (16 Jan 2004, p. 7). A biographical movie is a biopic; a comedy is a laffer; and a romancer is a romantic movie. A documentary is either a doc or a docu, and a star vehicle is a starrer; “Fonda has not acted in movies since the 1990 Robert DeNiro starrer ‘Stanley & Iris” (16 Jan 2004, p. 5). Cartoon is either clipped to toon; “IDT Entertainment, which last month acquired a controlling interest in Vancouver toon shop Mainframe Entertainment” (28 Jan 2004, p. 6), or is called a tooner. This last is not to be confused with tuner, a musical, “‘POPPINS’ TUNER TAPS A MARY” (28 Jan 2004, p. 12).

A film that can be classified as both a comedy or a drama is a dramedy. A martial arts film is chopsocky; “‘Bill’ started out as one long pic until Miramax decided to whack it in half and release the ultra-violent chopsocky yarn as a two-part franchise” (Variety.com, 8 Jan 2004). The paper dubs melodramas as mellers; “Pic noms are rounded out by [...] vet Antonio Mercero’s teen cancer meller ‘The Fourth Floor,’ a local hit” (Variety.com, 10 Dec 2003). A suspense film is a suspenser and a western is an oater, “Series was a space oater set 500 years in the future, tracking the journeys of the crew aboard the Serenity” (Variety.com, 2 Mar 2004).

Television genres have similar nicknames. A made-for-TV movie is a telepic or a made-for; “Although Cohen won’t direct the made-for, he did supervise the commercials for GM” (Variety.com 8 Mar 2004). A talk show is either a gabber, a talker, or a yakker; “Meanwhile, reigning triumvirate ‘The Oprah Winfrey Show,’ ‘Dr. Phil’ and ‘Live With Regis and Kelly’ have been the only gabbers to post any ratings upswing in households, this season to date” (16 Jan 2004, p. 38). Children’s television is kidvid and a sitcom aimed at teenagers is a zitcom. A soap opera is a sudser; “Francesca James, former exec producer of ABC’s "All My Children," was the first soap actress to exec produce a sudser” (Variety.com, 24 Feb 2004). A television miniseries is a mini and a TV special is a spec or a spesh; “Fox is no doubt hoping for boffo Nielsens from its animals boffing spesh, which is slated to air Feb. 13” (Variety.com, 19 Jan 2004). The plural is sometimes spex.

Nicknames of the various Hollywood studios are also part of Variety slang. Disney is either the Mouse or Mouse House; “The Mouse House bows ‘Disney’s Teacher’s Pet’” (16 Jan 2004, p. 7). Those that work there are, obviously, Mouseketeers, “Roy Disney and Stanley Gold are urging Mouse shareholders to reject head Mouseketeer Michael Eisner’s retention as board chairman” (28 Jan 2004, p. 6). Metro-Goldwin Mayer, or MGM, also has an animal nickname, the Lion or Leo, after its logo of a roaring lion.

Other studio nicknames are initialisms or clippings: WB for Warner Bros.; BV for Buena Vista, a Walt Disney label; Viv U for Vivendi Universal, or just U for Universal; Columbia Pictures is Col; and Paramount is P. These are the majors, as opposed the smaller independent productions, or indies; “The great Screener Wars pitted the indies vs. the majors” (28 Jan 2004, p. 1). Mid-size studios, like Miramax and New Line, that are neither majors nor indies are known as mini-majors. The independent production companies, those that do the grunt work of producing films and TV shows, are shingles. Shingles are usually centered around an individual producer who has metaphorically hung out a shingle. Jersey Films, for example, is actor-producer Danny DeVito’s shingle; “Landgraf had to negotiate an exit from both Jersey and Sony Pictures Television, where the shingle is in the final months of a production deal” (16 Jan 2004, p. 4).

Like the movie studios, each of the major US television networks, or nets, has its own nickname. ABC is the Alphabet net, while CBS, NBC, and the WB networks get their nicknames from their logos. CBS is the Eye and NBC is the Peacock. The WB is the Frog; “Frog did especially well on Thursday” (28 Jan 2004, p. 12). The Fox network does not get its own nickname; presumably the official name is catchy enough on its own. And the individual network affiliate stations, are affils.

Shows that air on outlets other than the major networks are off-net; “As for off-net action, there’s a slew of sitcoms waiting to strut their stuff in repeat mode” (16 Jan 2004, p. 38). Off-net stations can be pubcasters, or public broadcasters. They can be cablers, cable broadcasters; “Kids cabler [Nickelodeon] averaged 1.8 million viewers for the month” (28 Jan 2004, p. 12). Or they can be satcasters, satellite broadcasters. Subscription TV is feevee; “the digitalization of Germany’s cable systems would offer new and cost-effective opportunities for feevee ventures” (Variety.com, 14 Mar 2004). The smaller networks, namely UPN and the WB, are known as netlets, “‘Model’ [...] is within striking distance of ‘Buffy’s’ UPN-best 18-34 and total-viewer marks, set with that series’ two-hour netlet preem in October 2001” (Variety.com, 25 Feb 2004).

Job titles in the entertainment industry have their Variety slanguage equivalents as well. Film directors are helmers. Writers are scribes, scribblers, or scripters. Writer-directors are hyphenates, after the hyphenated title; “‘The first thing I did was call my dad,’ said ‘Seabiscuit’ hyphenate Gary Ross, who added both a writing and a best pic nom to his Oscar repertoire” (28 Jan 2004, p. 23). Scribes, scribblers, scripters, and hyphenates are typically members of the scribe house, or the Writer’s Guild of America. Those in front of the camera are thesps.

The paper uses similar terms for the music industry. Singers are thrushes; “Pact with Duff comes not long after the thesp/thrush inked a 2004-2005 comedy pilot deal with CBS” (15 Jan 2004, p. 6). A female singer is a chantoosie. Thrushes and chantoosies earn their living by chirping; "Dolly Parton, who joined Bonnie Raitt to sing ‘Angel From Montgomery,’ joked during a set change that she didn’t chirp the Raitt tune right" (Variety.com, 1 Oct 2003). Composers are either cleffers or tunesmiths, and dancers are either hoofers or a terps; “There’ll never be another hoofer like her. And there’ll be dancing in heaven with Annie, Fred (Astaire), Gene (Kelly) and Donald (O’Connor)” (Variety.com, 22 Jan 2004). All these thrushes and tunesmiths work for a diskery; “Studio and diskery execs embraced digital technology as a way of making scads of money by reformatting library titles in a new format” (Variety.com, 7 Dec 2003).

The talent are represented, or repped, by agents, or percenters; “the classic British TV nuclear thriller ‘Edge of Darkness,’ helmed by Martin Campbell, one of the percenter’s clients” (Variety.com, 19 Jun 2002). Percenters work for a percentery, or talent agency.

Producers and other business people are exex; “Ex-exex sue Bertelsmann” (16 Sep 2003, p. 25). Types of exex include prexies, “USA Network prexy Doug Herzog is expected to ankle his post” (28 Jan 2004, p. 1) and prezes, “Mohammed and Khatab ‘died of multiple gunshot wounds,’ CNN prez Jim Walton said in a note to staff” (28 Jan 2004, p. 6). Both prexies and prezes are toppers, or to most other English speakers, presidents; “Vivendi Universal officially withdrew its case against former topper Jean-Marie Messier” (28 Jan 2004, p. 8). The executive in charge of a production is a showrunner, “All three—as well as Jerry Bruckheimer—will be exec producers on ‘CSI: New York,’ with Zuiker serving as showrunner” (16 Jan 2004, p. 38).

All of these are simply seeking to acquire and entertain an aud; “But Paar was very much the center of the show, riveting auds even when he talked about himself” (28 Jan 2004, p. 2). Auds that are riveted usually engage in heavy rounds of mitting, or applause; “They garnered the heftiest mitting of the festival, plus three standing ovations” (Variety.com, 9 Jun 1992).

To Be Continued...

Oscar season brings its own set of slang terms to the fore. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is the Acad; “Acad voters sometimes overlooked big studio pics in favor of smaller films” (28 Jan 2004, p. 1). The best films of the year receive nods; “Aussie Naomi Watts, who garnered a nod from the Acad for her perf in ‘21 Grams’” (28 Jan 2004, p. 23), or noms; “New Line’s ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King’ led the charge with 11 noms” (28 Jan 2004, p. 1). Before the Oscars are awarded, all the nommed films are distributed to Acad members in the form of taped or DVD screeners. The annual broadcast of the Academy Award ceremony is the Oscarcast and the other various award shows that are broadcast in the Spring are generally dubbed kudocasts. The Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction prompted this headline about concerns of FCC fines for misbehavior at the award shows: “MORE NIPPLE RIPPLES Kudocasts scramble; pols eye increased fines” (6 Feb 2004, p. 7).

The production process garners its share of slanguage too. Studios evaluate potential projects by giving them a script-see; “Luhrmann’s bigscreen return, ‘Alexander the Great’ for U and DreamWorks and starring Leonardo Di Caprio (his Romeo+Juliet star), gets another script-see in February” (15 Jan 2004, p. 1). If the studio likes the script, it may greenlight the project. The person charge of the business side of a film or TV production doesn’t just produce it, they exec produce it. Once the business groundwork is laid, the real work begins and the film is lensed; “U.S. producers will lense thriller "Genesis Code" in Brazil” (Variety.com, 10 Mar 2004).

When a film is finished it is released for sneak previews or sneaks, “‘Bad Boys II’ arrested a beefy $621,000 on 83 [screens] in Sweden and $469,000 on 66 in Norway, including sneaks” (16 Sep 2003, p. 27). Shortly after sneaks, the film bows or has a preem, premiere, in the theater chains, or circuits; “Loews Cineplex is partnering with marketing company BrandGames on a promo to mark the circuit’s 100th anniversary” (16 Jan 2004, p. 12). Circuits are also known as distribs, distribberies, and exhibs. There are many different types of theaters where the films are unspooled. A hardtop is an indoor movie theater; compare that with the drive-in ozoner, “Noncompeting pic will unspool in the Swiss town’s giant Piazza Grande ozoner” (Variety.com, 28 Jul 1999). There are the arthouses. And film festivals are dubbed sprocket operas by the paper, “There’s that strange but unmistakable whiff of evolution in the air as the world’s best-known sprocket opera, the Cannes Film Festival, enters its 52nd edition” (Variety.com, 10 May 1999).

The goal of all this activity is to have a megapic, or big-budget motion picture; “inspired by scribe-helmer Stephen Sommer’s monster megapic” (16 Sep 2003, p. 1). The hope is to make lots of money at the box office, or B.O., “Oscar’s famous B.O. bounce applies primarily to best-pic nominees and winners” (28 Jan 2004, p. 22). A movie that carries with it high income expectations for the studio is a tentpole; “Universal’s summer 2004 tentpole ‘Van Helsing’ won’t open for another eight months” (16 Sep 2003, p. 1).

After the theater run, the film is released to homevid; “Lorber Media has joined forces with U.K. distrib 3DD Entertainment to launch a U.K. homevid-DVD label” (28 Jan 2004, p. 6). And if the film is really successful, it will succumb to sequel-itis; “Increasingly, survival in movies and TV is going to require similar foresight, not just the regular bouts of ‘sequel-itis’ to which networks and studios have grown accustomed” (28 Jan 2004, p. 2).

Instead of B.O., television toppers are primarily concerned with demo, or demographics; “‘Idol’s’ appeal stretched to viewers outside the 18-49 demo” (28 Jan 2004, p. 12). Some programming is aimed at children and those in that demo are called anklebiters; “If its auds are limited to anklebiters, the ‘Pet’ opening could be capped at the single-digit millions over three days” (16 Jan 2004, p. 43). Anklebiters typically watch TV on Saturday in the ayem, or a.m.; “Its ayem kids block bowed Saturday” (17 Sep 2003, p. 15).

One of the major factors in determining the ratings for various demos is the sked, which can also be a verb; “The independently financed production is skedded to begin next year” (28 Jan 2004, p. 5). Shows that are on in the early or late evening are fringe, from their position in relation to prime time; “Stations are quickly adding Ryan to their highly visible early fringe time slots” (16 Sep 2003, p. 5). TV series are skeins or, if the show is aired daily, strips; “Show had the usual halo affect [sic] on the Fox sked as new unscripted skein ‘My Big Fat Obnoxious Fiance’ opened big on Monday” (28 Jan 2004, p. 12). The individual episodes in a skein are segs; “No word yet on how many segs the actor will appear in” (15 Jan 2004, p. 14).

New skeins are either rookies or frosh; “After a strong start last week, Stephen King’s frosh drama ‘Kingdom Hospital’ suffered the Nielsen version of a cardiac arrest Wednesday night, losing a horrific 35% of its premiere audience” (Variety.com, 11 Mar 2004). The collegiate metaphor is continued in shows that survive their first year, which are called sophomores or sophs.

Successful shows hope to cash in on the lucrative syndication or syndie market; “Warner Bros. is busily working on upgrades of its syndie sophomore ‘The Ellen DeGeneres Show’” (16 Jan 2004, p. 38). Shows that aren’t successful are candidates for revamping; “The necessary revamp comes as ABC and Touchstone execs announced Tuesday that the show [...] will go on” (17 Sep 2003, p. 1).

Most people know that skeins begin with a pilot, but they may not know that Variety has terms for various types of pilots. A backdoor pilot is one filmed as a standalone movie, so it can be broadcast even if it is not picked up as a series. A busted pilot is one which the networks don’t pick up to become a series. If a show’s creator is lucky or a savvy negotiator, he can get a put pilot, one that carries substantial contractual penalties for the network if it is not aired—nearly a guarantee that it will be picked up as a series; “The WB has given one of its largest put pilot commitments ever to an autobiographical half-hour family comedy” (17 Sep 2003, p. 1).

Show biz is first and foremost a biz; it is not all stars and glamour, and Variety is not a glamour paper. At its heart it is a business paper, more interested, for example, in Ben and J.Lo’s box office than in their romance. Variety’s slanguage reflects this as well. All the entertainment companies, the congloms, seek to earn coin; “but it was coin—not the potential merger—that ultimately led to the Peacock landing the project” (16 Sep 2003, p. 29). Ducats is another term for money, but it is also used to mean tickets for a show (which is in some sense the same thing); “the skull and crossbones movie took in double the ducats ($70 million) its closest rival did on opening weekend” (Variety.com, 21 Dec 2003); “Ducats, sold online at vegas.com, allow patrons entry to the concert and provide front-of-the-line entrance to nightclubs” (Variety.com, 3 Dec 2003).

The total amount taken in by a movie is referred to as the cume, short for cumulative total; “Studio figures pic’s re-energized theatrical campaign could add more than $15 million to pic’s current $59 cume.” (28 Jan 2004, p. 22). To earn a large cume, a film must be both hotsy, strong at the box office, and have legs, a long performance run; “The long, not so hotsy, Good Friday weekend put a damper on 1994 grosses” (Variety.com, 4 Apr 1994); “Older-skewing pics usually don’t open big, but this one will have legs judging by its 11% soph sesh improvement in Mexico and its resilience in Australia” (Variety.com, 15 Feb 2004). Box office figures are often improved when a film is nominated for an award. When this happens, the film is said to have received a bounce; “Academy Award winners enjoy the biggest B.O. bounce from Oscar’s trampoline when they were released at the end of the calendar year” (28 Jan 2004, p. 22).

Hollywood is also a huge marketing and publicity machine. Variety refers to this as ad-pub, a clipping of advertising and publicity. Ad-pub attempts to boost, or promote, the studios’ products in an attempt to achieve boffo results at the box office. Ad-pub can appeal directly to theater-goers through television commercials, or blurbs, “Is blurb bang really worth Super bucks?” (headline, referring to Superbowl ads, 1 Feb 2004, p. 1). Or it can attempt to generate buzz indirectly by enthusing, “Mayor Michael Bloomberg enthused about the trio’s efforts to bolster the city” (15 Jan 2004, p. 36), to crix, or critics, and journos; “Crucified by local crix, film still managed a moderate first-week tally late February” (Variety.com, 7 Mar 2004. Those who do ad-pub work are praisers and public relations firms are praiseries. Another term for ad-pub is tubthumping; “The pic’s helmer, Vadim Perelman, was back in the former Soviet Union to tubthump the Russian release of film” (Variety.com, 7 Mar 2004).

One should not think from all this that Variety’s use of language is sloppy or haphazard. The slanguage is a house style and the paper rigidly adheres to using its own, and only its own, jargon terms. It does not permit non-Variety slang to intrude. Where it does use a general slang term, like most other papers and journals it, somewhat ironically given its extensive use of in-house slang, uses quotes to denote that this is a non-standard word; “Skein, tentatively titled ‘The Player,’ will take an ethnically diverse group of young singles and test whether they have the ‘player’ skills needed to find love (or the reality TV version thereof) of mansions, expensive cars, and exclusive parties;” (16 Jan 2004, p. 5); “those who simply think they’ve got ‘game’” (16 Jan 2004, p. 5).

Variety’s slanguage marks the paper as one of the most distinctive publications in the English language. A few style rules and heavy use of a particular slang glossary creates the aura of celebrity and glitterati. By reading more like a gossip column than a business magazine, Variety brings zest and zing to the world of contracts and business deals.

Eeep ! Whaaat ? Whooo ? Ehhhh ?
by TheCap
Jun 30th, 2008
06:32:48 AM
I'm OOOOOLD ... gimme gimme gimme gimme ! Now, you damn kids get the HELL off my LAWN before I HIT ya little punks with my CANE ! Lemme alone - I gotta go vote Republican ! (God, I hate old people.)
HIMYM is for 45 year olds?...
by DanielKurland
Jun 30th, 2008
06:33:37 AM
Absolutely RIDICULOUS.
Ultimate Planet of the Apes for 60 Bucks at Amazon!
by tonagan
Jun 30th, 2008
06:52:35 AM
It's the dvd collection in the ape head. I didn't buy it the last time, but I'm giving in to temptation this time around, damn it all to hell.
Or it could just be there's a helluva lot more old people
by chrth
Jun 30th, 2008
07:04:14 AM
They're called the Baby Boomers for a reason, you know.
So THAT'S why there's no HIMYM talk on AICN
by LlGHTST0RMER
Jun 30th, 2008
07:07:01 AM
...although I guess it doesn't really fit the "genre" niche that AICN is all about. Still, I kinda love that show.

I do wonder why "Big Bang Theory" is never discussed on AICN, though. Semms right up the alley of the average Talkbacker... (myself included.)

Er... "Seems."
by LlGHTST0RMER
Jun 30th, 2008
07:09:38 AM
Not "semms." Hey... it's 5am. Past my bedtime, ya know?

by Dradis Contact
Jun 30th, 2008
07:30:47 AM
a skein is a quantity of yarn
MAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTLLLLOCCCCKKK
by ChrisTuckersOnlyFan
Jun 30th, 2008
08:00:24 AM
That's what I thought they all liked.
Neilsens are bunk
by The Pelti
Jun 30th, 2008
08:26:46 AM
I think the real news here is that Neilsen's have no clue what young people are doing between the time they move out of their parents house, and the time they settle down and have kids and get recruited as a 'Neilsen Family'. I think the networks and the Neilsens are stil wedded to the antiquated idea that the TV is going to be on all day and night in a household, that some suzie homemaker mom is going to be watching soap operas while she vacuums, until the kids get home and watch cartoons while mom makes dinner, then dad gets home, hangs his hat and briefcase on the coatrack in the foyer, and sits down to watch the news. Then after dinner, the entire family gathers around the television to watch wholesome family programming until the kids are put to sleep and mom and dad can watch the more risque post watershed programming
Data is Flawed
by Astronomer
Jun 30th, 2008
08:28:25 AM
The key phrase in the article is LIVE viewers. These are people who don't use DVRs. It would be quite obvious to assume that older people have not moved to DVR technology, while younger people have embraced it. Any intelligent broadcaster would see that, and adapt their business model as such. But again, this is broadcast networks we're talking about.
Not Surprising
by El-Gorko
Jun 30th, 2008
09:15:15 AM
Frankly, I'm not surprised that the average age of television viewers is increasing on the Networks. For those under 30, how many shows do you watch on a Network? I am 24 years old and only watch two shows there: Lost and Scrubs. Everything else I watch is either on Discovery Channel, The Learning Channel, Spike, G4, the Cartoon Network, or the Food Network.

Most of my peers watch television in the same manner. Sure, I'll occasionally catch an episode of HIMYM or TBBT, but those are few and far between. These Nielsen ratings also do not incorporate the average age of internet viewers. Now that neworks are streaming a lot of their programming, I find myself less confined to watch television when they dictate... especially considering I have a media center PC hooked up to a 42" LCD TV for the purpose of streaming movies/television from Netflix, Hulu, Adult Swim, and the networks. This also saves me a $120 or so a year since I don't need to acquire a DVR.
Average age of AICN reader?
by snowpuff
Jun 30th, 2008
09:15:45 AM
I would guess: 27. Remember we're talking averages here. I'd say the range of ages for AICN is from 13 to 45 in general. Herc's age, I'd guess, is 33.
it's because our generation is getting older
by zooch
Jun 30th, 2008
09:18:37 AM
but our viewing habits haven't changed.
I agree this seems to be more of an indictment
by TVguy4566
Jun 30th, 2008
09:19:32 AM
of the Neilsen rating system than the age of the average viewer. Although I am not a Neilsen family, I would definitely skew their data since I DVR almost everything to avoid comericials and watch three shows in the time it would usually take to watch 2 shows. I rarely watch anything realtime anymore.
Reality tv
by deadboy1313
Jun 30th, 2008
09:30:41 AM
It seems we geezers aren't making the top shows reality tv, except of course for 60 Minutes. If the networks want to keep older viewers maybe they should start giving us decent shows. If I want reality I'll look out my window.
Most 30 AND UNDER STILL LIVE AT HOME
by EvilWizardGlick
Jun 30th, 2008
10:10:40 AM
It isn't like the 50's to the early 80's, they don't have the income to move out.

I imagine that would skew data if it is based on home owner stats not viewer stats.

Take into account we have an older population with Europe not even breeding enough to replace their older generation and we see even further problems.

Matter of fact a number of Scifi stories anticipated a greying of the world populace.

Neilsens are antiquated.
by ZeroCorpse
Jun 30th, 2008
10:13:09 AM
I wish the networks would stop relying on them. Between tivo, bittorrent, Apple TV/iTunes, Netflix/Roku, Blockbuster, Xbox 360 Marketplace, and a variety of other online or non-broadcast methods, younger people are making television fit THEIR schedule; Not adhering to the old network time-slots.

People watch shows on their computers, on their phones, on their iPods, on DVD, and on instant download services. Younger viewers know they can watch it NOW and without commercials. They can take it with them. They can do something in the evening with friends, and then watch their TV shows the next day on their computer/iPod at work, or during the commute, or in class.

They also know that subscribing to cable is getting to be pointless, because the best content is available elsewhere.

I used to pay for DirecTV in HD. Every month I'd shell out over $75 to DTV. Then I realized that during that month, I was watching four episodes each of about a half dozen shows. Why was I paying for that? To get reruns of chopped up old movies and syndicated older shows? To get access to networks like SciFi who have maybe TWO good shows and then another 22 hours of crap? To watch Comedy Central play the same movie every month just so I could watch Jon Stewart mug at the camera in the evening? To watch a shitload of commercials after PAYING for this content in the first place!?!?

Fuck that! I cancelled satellite, and dropped back to over the air television. I prepaid for my Netflix subscription (a lot cheaper than cable or satellite) and picked up a Roku Netflix Player (formerly had an Apple TV, but that's a pay-per-show solution). I'm now watching movies and TV shows when I want to. Maybe I'm behind a bit. Maybe I'm watching older shows. . . But between Netflix and online possibilities (official online airings, iTunes, etc.) I can watch almost anything on television past or present (and sometimes even future).

If we were a Neilsen family we'd completely ruin their ratings system. We're sidestepping it. We're directly downloading content instead of watching when networks air it with a bunch of ads.

But do they count downloads and views online in their ratings? From what I've seen: No.

Measuring what people watch over-the-air isn't reliable anymore. It's old-fashioned. It's quaint. It pictures the 1950s/1960s/1970s family. It does not consider new technology, except to say ratings are slipping because people are web browsing or playing video games.

But that's not all they're doing. People are watching shows online. They're skipping the broadcast part of this equation because direct access is at the point where it's more convenient. They're renting DVD sets from Netflix. They're getting episodes from network website video viewers.

If they want to know what people are REALLY watching, they should probably just ask us. I think at this point, an online poll would be more reliable than a monitoring device hooked to the television.

Hell, 50% of the time, I don't even watch television shows on my television! I watch them on other devices!

And here's the kicker: I'm 37 years old. If I'm doing this, then I'd imagine the younger crowd is doing it MORE than me.

I do agree with one Neilsen conclusion
by ZeroCorpse
Jun 30th, 2008
10:26:49 AM
CBS has ALWAYS been for the old people.
Instead of battling Youtube they need to embrace it
by terry1978
Jun 30th, 2008
10:28:19 AM
Going into a legal battle over someone posting a new ep. of your network's shows, you need to see how many views it's getting and figure out how to get a piece of that pie.
Terry1978 -- Exactly my point.
by ZeroCorpse
Jun 30th, 2008
10:46:17 AM
The old suits at the networks have been so busy battling the new technologies that they missed out on the fact that YouTube and other online sources are a great way to see who your show is reaching.

But this upsets their old model of wedging commercials into show breaks. Online, or with other methods (DVD, etc.) you don't get the ad revenue you normally would because you can't prove to the advertisers that their message is getting through. The WHOLE television industry is based around this model. We provide the shows, you hawk your goods, and if your product sells more because it was advertised on a popular show then we'll keep making that show. If your product doesn't sell well, then we assume it's because the show wasn't a hit, and we'll stop making it.

Commercials are the problem. They need to drop the current advertising model and lean more heavily toward product placement (and not BAD product placement, but natural, realistic product placement).

Or maybe they should stop relying on advertisers at all, and start funding shows purely with the money collected from direct sales of the show itself.

If Variety was a television show it would be called...
by rosasaks
Jun 30th, 2008
11:16:37 AM
Skeinfeld!
It's ridiculous to categorize people anyway
by KnightShift
Jun 30th, 2008
11:40:20 AM
Young, old, white, black, rich, poor, "Democrat" or "Republican" (the most worthless categorization of all)... what the hell ever happened to looking at people as INDIVIDUALS?!? I just finished work as a cast member for a regional theatre production of a musical: we had people of all kinds among our cast and crew, from a wide variety of backgrounds. And I'll be damned if for one moment I saw any of them as "white chicks" or "black dudes" or "gay guys" or whatever. They were just *individual people*, each one worth respecting for that much. To shove everyone in this or that bracket is cheap and worse: the ONLY reason to want to do it anyway is to try to exploit people somehow. Hell, I've got a 74-year old great aunt who designed her own Myspace page and it kicks BUTT!!! I sure as hell couldn't have done it as beautifully as she did... but here she did something a lot better than most "young" people usually do. How about the successful, happily-married family man of 60 who plays World of Warcraft with his children? Or the 13-year old doing graduate-level genetic research? All of these and more, I know examples of. This is a whole new age for the common man: when YouTube and blogging takes EACH of us out of the status of mere pawns and makes us just as powerful as the networks or any major publishing house. The Powers That Be to whom the Nielsen ratings mean something are WAY behind the times And until "they" start to understand why, they're not gonna catch up.
we need the median age, not the average
by punto
Jun 30th, 2008
11:44:41 AM
average means that half of the people watching are older, and half are younger. so, half the people watching "one tree hill" (that shit is still on?) are younger than 26 (say 10-26), half the people are older (say 26 to 42). So people from 10 to 42 are watching, which makes sense.

Not that I don't think TV is dying, I'm just saying "average age" means nothing.

Dude Neilsons suck becuse they don't count my dvr...
by Darth_Inedible
Jun 30th, 2008
12:19:21 PM
...which I use to avoid commercials. Dudes I hate to break it to you but broadcast TV ratings are all about how finding out how many people are watching those commercials. Why the fuck would Sears or Kellogg's or any of the other company paying ABC to make TV shows care how many people are watching these shows on Youtube?
Punto, you've mixed that up
by Big Jim
Jun 30th, 2008
12:20:46 PM
Median means half are over and half are under. If you take the total number of people (let's say 1 million), you then divide that number in 2 (500,000). You then list the age of every person chronologically and count up, or down, and the age of # 500,000 is the median age.

Average is the sum total of all ages of the people sampled, divided by the number of people sampled.

Most likely, whichever way you do it, you will get similar results. However, if, for example, one show is watched only by grandparents (55+) and pre-teens (1-12), the average would fall somewhere in the middle, while the median would skew either really young or really old.

Zerocorpse
by Darth_Inedible
Jun 30th, 2008
12:30:00 PM
Just imagine all the hilariously inappropriate product placement you could have on a show like Lost. Of course doing what you suggest would severely limit what shows could be produced.
to conclude
by Big Jim
Jun 30th, 2008
12:33:59 PM
(incomplete thoughts are part of my charm)

You are right, Punto, median would be a better indicator than average because it would better represent the majority of viewers. If 2/3 of the viewers were under 12, while the over 1/3 were all over 55, the average would be somewhere between, representing an age group that doesn't actually watch the show. However, the median age would fall in that under 12 group which does in fact represent two-thirds of the viewers.

"over 1/3" should be "other 1/3"
by Big Jim
Jun 30th, 2008
12:35:46 PM
(typos are never charming)
Mathematics...
by rosasaks
Jun 30th, 2008
02:23:30 PM
If the only people who watched a program were four five year old brothers and their ninety year old grandmother who was babysitting, then the average viewing age of the audience would be twenty two. Which would be bollocks.
Thank God for 60 Minutes too
by Judge Briggs
Jun 30th, 2008
03:11:34 PM
I am 27 and LOVE 60 Minutes. Really terrific news stories!
fuck nelson
by Project424
Jun 30th, 2008
03:13:34 PM
I'll never watch anything he does again. Major Dad sucked swamp weed. and Coach? gimme Simon + Simon, thank you.
ARE THESE PEOPLE FUCKING INSANE?
by vini77
Jun 30th, 2008
03:17:59 PM
There is no way this is a real statistic...
Downloads are still important to measure...
by _Maltheus_
Jun 30th, 2008
04:13:26 PM
...since they reflect relative interest in a show. And DVRs don't mean that people don't ever watch the commercials. By limiting themselves to the people who can't figure out these technologies, they lack a true picture of what shows are most likely to succeed.
lol 60 minutes
by BurgerKing
Jun 30th, 2008
05:04:53 PM
that fucking clock puts me to sleep before the people even come on screen.
oh good, i dont feel so old anymore
by bacci40
Jun 30th, 2008
06:55:42 PM
note to the networks...viewing habits are changing...STOP PUTTING ON SHIT...kids today can entertain themselves, with the wii, tons of online games, youtube and chat sites like stickam...they dont need you anymore...looks like sag and aftra are gonna cave, so you dont have to worry about a strike...now its time to make good shows...
and let me add this
by bacci40
Jun 30th, 2008
07:07:19 PM
all the kids know every streaming and torrent site...why should they be glued to the boob tube when they all have their iphones and laptops
haha, CBS is old
by palooka_boy
Jun 30th, 2008
09:44:30 PM
I think its funny that Price Is Right's average probably hits the dead middle between those. but I'm surprised How I Met Your Mother has so high an average. that show is awesome and seems to be aimed toward a younger demo
only a matter of time
by DougMcKenzie
Jun 30th, 2008
09:45:10 PM
until two things happen because of PVR use: 1) a scrolling ticker of commericals ala the news and sports tickers. 2)non-skippable ads played in front of PVR recorded shows ala internet videos. I agree that networks need to change their business models drastically to avoid dying. Nowadays top ten shows have ratings that would have had then canceled after three weeks just 20 years ago.
If you are 50+ and reading this, get the fuck out of here.
by Cotton McKnight
Jun 30th, 2008
10:00:04 PM
We don't want your kind!
Hey Cotton, frak you, troll
by NickJBauer2009
Jun 30th, 2008
11:00:12 PM
So I'm old (60) and I don't watch any of those crap shows. I watch "Lost" & "Heroes" & "Galactica" & "Doctor Who" and LOTS of movies. You got a problem with that? Your problem, not mine. Deal with it. I like it here (except for the occasional idiot) and I'm sticking around.
So thats what that noise is when I watch TV
by Yeti
Jul 1st, 2008
02:36:51 PM
My bones creaking and my arteries hardening.
romanocc - The Pregnancy Pact
by Yeti
Jul 1st, 2008
02:40:33 PM
Brings new definition to the term "stupid slut" dosen't it? Cripes.
A frickin easy paradigm for networks
by eXcommunicated
Jul 1st, 2008
03:40:59 PM
Here's how they embrace new technology and still make money on advertising. Show a commercial at the beginning of each show. You also have banner ads along the side. Voila. Jesus, it's so easy. With banner ads, the advertising is there THE WHOLE TIME. No need to intersperse advertisements throughout the show when the advertisement is along the side of the page the whole show.
Hell
by eXcommunicated
Jul 1st, 2008
03:42:07 PM
Even add some Web 2.0 to the mix and let people rate the advertising, create profiles with link to their favorite shows, discussion forums for each show, etc.
It makes so much sense....
by eXcommunicated
Jul 1st, 2008
03:42:39 PM
... that I should start such a website right now. brb. ;)
Richard Stark knows not whereof he speaks
by Bibliographer
Jul 2nd, 2008
08:17:30 AM
So I'm 60. So what? BFD. If I were 12, instead of having a degree in English over 30 years ago, I wouldn't care that "Your 12" is incorrect. You mean "You're 12" -- its a contraction, not a possessive. But that's beside the point. The point is that though generations may trend differently, you can't stereotype age any more than race, gender or sexuality. Some 60 year olds post on YouTube, some 18 year olds vote Republican. Older people may think that the best films ever made have not all been released in the last 10 years. That doesn't make my viewpoint worthless or irrelevant. Maybe you'll grow up and become more tolerant. Maybe not. Not my problem.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.