Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

THE STAND is the greatest novel of the 20th century.
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
06:57:52 AM
Simple as that. How the hell can a funny-book do it justice?
Love the Stand, will buy the comic...
by RockLobster800
Sep 17th, 2008
07:22:54 AM
but Im still not crazy about Flagg with long hair....hated that in the miniseries (which was okay at the most-completely ruined the finale, amongst other things) and its been kept up since...,I mean the guy is supposed to look intimidating sure, but he's not supposed to look filthy and tramp like-lets not forget he's charismatic and alluring enough to win a fair few people over. And that image of him doesnt help me think that...
Dark Tower and The Stand
by grendelson138
Sep 17th, 2008
07:29:36 AM
I've been really let down by the Dark Tower comics. Roland's trip into the pink grapefruit doesn't match up with the books at all. And, The Stand comic looks like even more of a mess. I don't mind them making comics based on Stephen King books, but there's no reason to crap all over the original stories to do it.
THE GUNSLINGER BORN was candy-coloured Marvel crap
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
07:47:02 AM
Barely an ounce of King's stunningly-realised world came across in that air-brushed atrocity. If it had been done by Dark Horse with an artist like Gary Gianni then it would ahve been epic.
Bizarro am suckiest character.
by rev_skarekroe
Sep 17th, 2008
07:54:23 AM
Me hate Bizarro! Also, me hate Eric Powell. Powell's art am totally wrong for comic with monster Superman. Me will totally not buy this book, will spend money on quality comic by Liefeld instead.
Long haired Flagg?
by rev_skarekroe
Sep 17th, 2008
07:55:30 AM
Beats Flagg with a mullet.
Bizarro
by optimous_douche
Sep 17th, 2008
07:57:30 AM
I think that was the only Johns series I have ever bailed on because of my utter hatred for Bizzaro.

I'm sure it was well-done, but I hate that double negative mush mouth as much as Jar-Jar Binks.

but to be fair Rev..
by RockLobster800
Sep 17th, 2008
07:57:46 AM
dont you kinda want to see Billy Ray Cyrus play him?
Greatest novel of the 20th century?
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
08:07:20 AM
Read books much? That ain't it. Am I the only one who feels like King's books are always about 300 pages longer than the story needs? I can't think of a writer whose middles drag more than his. I've always really liked The Stand, though. But come on, greatest novel of the 20th century? That's a joke, right?
BEST JONAH HEX REVIEW....EVER!
by Err
Sep 17th, 2008
08:11:17 AM
Loved it.
J.H. Williams III
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
08:11:50 AM
Is sooooo fucking good. I was reading the new Batman hc, where he illustrates that three-part 'club of heroes' story. Man, I'd pay twice the current cover price if he'd illustrate R.I.P. He's the best Morrison artist.
Lex Luthor's moral ambiguity...
by Err
Sep 17th, 2008
08:14:52 AM
Certain characters work well in the realm of moral ambiguity. Two of them really really really REALLY do not: The Joker and Lex Luthor. How is Luthor morally ambiguous? Is it because he has a 12th level + intellect and we, as the reader, could not possibly fully fathom his greatness? Please someone justify for me that Lex taking out Superman is good. Tell me that he's been doing it to protect his city, to protect his people! Tell me, that Lex is doing it to save Earth from complaceny due to Superman's presence. Because last time I checked, that's not a real reason to murder, destroy, etc. Saying Lex Luthor is morally ambiguous is like looking at the Anti-Monitor and going, I sympathize with him.
Mike Perkins is also great
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
08:15:17 AM
His issues of Captain America have this great, classical look. Almost like Al Williamson.

I'll stop stating the obvious now.

Laserhead: Yep!!
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
08:36:30 AM
Fuck any of that other crap critics have blown their wads over. Don't forget that the 'The Da Vinci Code' in on every single 'Top Ten' list ever published in the past five years. THE STAND is the greatest novel of ALL TIME!!! How do you like that!?!
The Stand IS a great book...
by 11ZOMBIES
Sep 17th, 2008
08:49:04 AM
...and "The Stand" - the comic book- is NOT a great comic. The artwork is downright bizarre at times, and all the characters are a bit too finely drawn for you to put yourself in their shoes. Plus, Springsteen as Larry Underwood? I know King himself mentioned that at one point in the past, but I certainly never wanted to see it. Epic fail from Marvel.
No, Max, no.
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
09:41:27 AM
That's a kind of idiot-snobbery that insists that no one really enjoys "so-called" great works of art; that they only pretend to in order to "feel smart". A great work of literature does more than just tell an entertaining story (though they do that), they also invoke characterization and insight in such a way that a reader is actually expanded as a person-- your perceptions, sympathies and capacity for empathy are all increased. It's true. It's okay that 'The Stand' is your favorite book; it's idiot-snobbery to insist that great works of art are crap because you lack the initiative to experience them. No offense.
There's a Dr. Bong? Really?
by fiester
Sep 17th, 2008
09:42:30 AM
And Luthor looks too much like The Kingpin on that cover.
And 'The DaVinci Code' is only on top 10 lists
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
09:43:07 AM
as far as sales. Is that what you measure great art as; what sells the most? In that case, forget Dickens, Shakespeare and Faulkner-- Harold Robbins is the single greatest novelist in the history of the world, bar none.
Dr. Bong
by fiester
Sep 17th, 2008
09:47:53 AM
Just looked him up on Wiki...guess he wasn't the kind of bong I was thinking of.
Secret Invasion
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
09:52:56 AM
Looking at the December solicitations, it looks like the Skrulls win. Is this old news?
Nope, sorry...
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
09:55:43 AM
THE STAND is the most profound, entertaining, emotionally-devastating, insightful, rewarding novel in the last hundred years of the written word. Pure genius, every last page of it. The only other book I'd consider coming close to THE STAND is OF MICE AND MEN.
Bwah-hah-hah-hah
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:01:56 AM
I just realized I'm talking to a kid.
The ComicSpace website hasn't been updated in almost a year
by Ye Not Guilty
Sep 17th, 2008
10:02:50 AM
Hey @$$holes, update your reviews once in a while, please.
Childish dismissal: The last refuge of the defeated.
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
10:09:52 AM
Sorry, Laserhead. Back to school for you. Yes, popular fiction CAN be profound and transcendent. THE STAND is the greatest novel ever.
LAser Skrulls
by optimous_douche
Sep 17th, 2008
10:13:37 AM
The scullybut I've herad is that Earth is going to become Alien Nation (the Mandy Patinkin James Caan flick).
The Stand
by optimous_douche
Sep 17th, 2008
10:14:27 AM
Anyone else think that Clive Barker's Great and Secret Show gives The Stand a run for its money?
Ah, declaring victory: the last refuge of the defeated
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:14:47 AM
Yes-- popular fiction CAN be profound and transcendent. But 'The Stand' isn't it. And 'Of Mice and Men'? Let me suggest that a novel which can be fully appreciated by 11 year-olds isn't the greatest novel of the 20th century. You know, Hemingway, Roth, DeLillo, McCarthy-- all are ENORMOUSLY popular writers who write populist fiction to some degree. Speaking of education, read some of these and then get back to me: 'For Whom the Bell Tolls', 'Absalom, Absalom', 'The Adventures of Augie March,' 'As I Lay Dying,' 'Zuckerman Bound', 'Underworld,' 'Blood Meridian', et. al.
Optimus
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:16:06 AM
I think 'The Great and Secret Show' is actually a bit better than 'The Stand'. It certainly has less wasted passages of overlong, extraneous scenes. You just reminded me how much I loved that book. Haven't read it in years.

Alien Nation Marvel Universe? That sounds... really boring.

MaxtheSilent
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:17:13 AM
Jeff Albertson? Is that you?
It's all good, baby!!
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
10:23:54 AM
Jesus loves you and so do I. Simple fact is that THE STAND is one long-ass fucker of a book, and as was painfully demonstrated by THE GUNSLINGER BORN, no comic could possibly do it justice. I'd rather they take the money they spent on the comic, hire some billboards to say 'Read THE STAND!! It's really good!!'
SWAN SONG is better than THE STAND
by superhero
Sep 17th, 2008
10:24:00 AM
It's true.
The Great and Secret Show
by Psynapse
Sep 17th, 2008
10:24:25 AM
PWNZ The Stand in my book. Good Vs. Evil? Simplistic at best and been there done that. Human awareness and the vastness that exists outside of it? That's a tasty treat.
Psynapse
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:25:25 AM
I concur in spades.
Optimus
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
10:28:11 AM
Personally I place Imajica over The Great and Secret Show.... but now that you've brought it up, I've got the hankering to revisit both. Wasn't TGaSS a part of an uncompleted trilogy, or am I just making that up?
Superhero
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
10:30:11 AM
As much as I enjoyed Swan Song, I have to respectfully disagree.
Not Sure About a Trilogy for TGaSS
by optimous_douche
Sep 17th, 2008
10:32:28 AM
But if there is, I woudl read it. I was a kid when the first one (if there's more) came out and just remember the horror on my parent's faces based on the cover alone.
M-O-O-N
by rxse7en
Sep 17th, 2008
10:34:37 AM
That spells HBO Miniseries.
Trilogy
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:34:42 AM
I don't think you're making it up Bango-- for some reason I remember hearing or being led to believe the same thing-- and that the trilogy revolved around Quidity (?)
...
by blackthought
Sep 17th, 2008
10:34:43 AM
that hex review...nice.
Everville is the sequel...
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
10:35:08 AM
to The Great and Secret Show.... but I thought Barker had said that he's always planned that there would be a third book.
Ahhhh, IMAJICA...
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
10:38:23 AM
God, what an monumental work of genius that is. To this day, a full 17 years after I read it, I can't believe (SPOILER ALERT!!) Barker actually had Huzzah killed by the Eurhetemec in that alley. (SPOILER OVER!!) That was probably the most cold-blooded shit I'd ever read. Apart from (SPOILER ALERT... AGAIN!!) Nick Andros finding that bomb and getting blown to fuck in THE STAND. (SPOILER OVER!!)
Barker's 'Books of the Art'.
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
10:43:40 AM
So far we've had WEAVEWORLD, THE GREAT AND SECRET SHOW and EVERVILLE. I didn't like EVERVILLE that much and I don't think I'm alone in finding SACRAMENT and GALILEE utterly tedious. I've not read any of the ABARAT books, but I can't wait for the long-awaited SCARLET GOSPELS, even if it does end up 1500 pages long, as Barker has indicated.
my ownly beef with The Stand book...
by RockLobster800
Sep 17th, 2008
10:46:56 AM
(and SPOILER for those who have yet to read it)...is that they make Flaggs defeat too obvious waaaaay before the end. I mean the writings on the wall too much-in his own inner fear thats constantly brought up, in his failure to see Tom Cullen, in Nadines suicide and what she says to him before-all these signs that the guy is going down takes away the tension for me a bit. Personally I think Nadine should have stayed alive at least until the Hand Of God bit-you dont need her to ty to redeem herself, she can just stay mired in guilt or maybe have her renounce Flagg completely just in her last moments. And dear God, YES to a HBO miniseries-with a Lost budget, a restraining order on Mick Garris, and a writer/director who WONT feel the need to turn Flagg inot a demon every five seconds in order to make him scary...and even though I always post it heres the dream cast-Nathan Fillion=Stu, Zooey Deschanel=Fran,Joaquin Phoenix=Larry or possibly Flagg, Ethan Suplee=Tom Cullen, Jared Leto=Nick, and Danny Huston as the Walkin Dude.
my beef with The Stand
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:50:54 AM
I think it's along the lines of what psynapse said. Basically, everything after the outbreak of Capt. Tripps (which is really good), is really simplistic and (like so many of King's books) anti-climactic. GOOD and EVIL form armies that gather for war and... the hand of god appears and sets off a nuclear device. Wow. Took 900 pages to do that? I still think 'The Shining' is the best King-- the place where his pop becomes most moving and artistic.
Weaveworld...
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
10:55:39 AM
Was one of the books of art? Hmmm, I barely remember that book. I couldn't choke down Sacrament, one of less than a dozen books I stopped reading halfway through. I actually liked Galilee a bit better, though far from a favorite.

I just got into a "favorite book" discussion two night ago... one that came about --now that I think about it-- as a result of a buddy of mine reading my copy of the Captain Trips comic... I don't claim that they're the "best" books ever written, but The Stand and Imajica are still my favorite.

RockLobster800
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
10:58:26 AM
Your cast list just about makes me want to weep with joy at how PERFECT it is. Although as much as Garris's brave attempt ultimately failed, I think Gary Sinise as Stu was one of the most spot-on pieces of casting ever. Shame Molly Ringwald was utterly atrocious as Franny Goldsmith.
Yeah: 'favorite' doesn't equal 'best'-- important distinction
by Laserhead
Sep 17th, 2008
10:59:37 AM
I stop reading lots of books now. I used to finish everything out of some mistaken sense of obligation, but now I give them 100 pages. If by page 100, I don't want to read anymore-- it's gone. Life's just too fucking short.
SCARLET GOSPELS!
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
11:00:56 AM
Holy shit... I knew nothing about this book, but just looked it up. Harry D'Amour versus Pinhead??? Thank you for the heads-up!!!!
The Stand is a shaggy Satan Story.
by Smerdyakov
Sep 17th, 2008
11:04:08 AM
A 400 page lead up to a stupid deux ex machina ending. "Gee, I don't know how to end this, I guess I'll just blow everything up."
Laserhead....
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
11:08:34 AM
Yeah, I should clarify, I now give books about a hundred pages too.... Usually I'm careful about pickin' my reads, but still, I don't have that kind of time anymore. Back when I read Sacrament, I'd plug though almost anything until the end, out of a likewise misguided sense of duty.... But no more.
King's endings often suck ass.
by MaxTheSilent
Sep 17th, 2008
11:09:33 AM
But as a writer of vivid characterisation, there's none better.
Swan Song is very good but no The Stand...
by Flip63Hole
Sep 17th, 2008
11:43:43 AM
Sorry Robert M, I still love ya!
The Great and Secret Show...
by Sailor Rip
Sep 17th, 2008
11:44:26 AM
...ugh. Read half the book and couldn't even finish it. The Stand is classic literature compared to that.

As far as the comic goes, I thought it was good. Started out the way it should and even though I'm very familiar with the material it still kept my interest.

Deadpool!
by DuncanDisorderly
Sep 17th, 2008
11:46:57 AM
At last, a Secret Invasion story actually worth the money- Bendis take note... The Skrulls have prepared for every eventuality; except an insane mercenary with a Wile E. Coyote fixation!
fuck The Stand
by spidercoz
Sep 17th, 2008
11:56:45 AM
and fuck Stephen King, there I said it
"the book never fails to disappoint." This is an insult. Is it
by freydis
Sep 17th, 2008
12:04:55 PM
I'm pretty sure that it's just a victim of combined cliches, since otherwise the Deadpool review looks pretty positive.
I'm with you, Laserhead
by Joenathan
Sep 17th, 2008
12:18:45 PM
The Stand is a great book, but its not THE greatest. Although, I don't think you should bother argueing the point with Max, he's either overstating for effect or truly, truly believes what he is saying like the literary version of a suicide bomber.
sorry, the best Tom Cullen
by Joenathan
Sep 17th, 2008
12:21:31 PM
was that big retarded guy from Coach. I had a mental picture of him the first time I read the book. He was perfect.
why no sequel to Stand and IT?
by johnnyg korrupt
Sep 17th, 2008
12:22:43 PM
His 2 best books by a mile...and the storylines lent itself to sequels, especially in the case of the Stand (Flagg lives). Seems Kings just hates sequels apart from Black House. Thing is those 2 books are EPIC and life defining. They take up a portion of your life and you never forget the time/place/occassion you were in when you read them. That's why they are magical. Im a slow reader so both took me a few months to read but i'll never forget them the rest of my life. Stand i was about 18 and read it nights during summer here in Australia and It i was still in school and it was winter. I may have read better written books before but those 2 take me back to another place whenever i think about them
*****Dark Tower Spoiler*****
by santi01
Sep 17th, 2008
12:27:26 PM
Flagg dies at the end of the Dark Tower series, way to easy if you ask me. But i agree about a sequel for IT.
The Great and Secret Show (redux)
by Psynapse
Sep 17th, 2008
12:29:28 PM
Is indeed part of a Trilogy. Barker has said that Everville was the hardest book he's ever written so it may be awhile 'til we see it.

And ANYONE reading this column or TB that doesn't at least check out the trade of IDW's adaptation of TGASS is missing out. It was a pitch perfect adaptation of the source material with GORGEOUS art.

The Stand
by Joenathan
Sep 17th, 2008
12:30:05 PM
The struggle of good vs. evil is not a “been there, done that” type of story, it is at the heart of most of the things we discuss here. The stand is the story of the ancient struggle of god and the devil played out again and again, but you all act like the story was told for the purpose of the bomb at the end, come on, the bomb was nothing, it was just a moment, the story (or the 400 pages of build up, as you call it) was about the people, the little stories that get lost amongst the riot of the bigger picture. That was the point. There was no ending, the bomb didn't stop Flagg, the walking dude kept on walking and he just started over somewhere else, same as forever, good and evil and their continuous struggle.
The 100 page rule.
by Joenathan
Sep 17th, 2008
12:31:52 PM
I get what you're saying and kind of do the same thing, but I very my tolerance level based on the type of book and all that. Slow times slow builders blow best, you know?
I disagree regarding a sequel to "It"
by Psynapse
Sep 17th, 2008
12:32:17 PM
"It" had one of THE lamest endings I've ever read given the amount of build-up to what "It" actually was. Considering how often the ending to a King novel sucks so badly I have no hope that a sequel would fare any better.
Stand sequel
by Joenathan
Sep 17th, 2008
12:35:29 PM
Isn't the Dark Tower series considered connected to the point that it could considered one? Maybe its retconned differently now, but I always felt Frannie and Stu's little world they drive off into at the end was actually the far, far, far distant past relative of the gunsslinger's world.
The Stand:This is like arguing the flaws of Star Wars
by Psynapse
Sep 17th, 2008
12:36:09 PM
If YOU find it entertaning more power to ya. I found it banal when all was said and done. And the story of "God" and "The Devil" is WAAAAY played out as western mythologies go. Personally I find an exploration of creation that posits a situation far removed from those two quite constraining paradigms of thought.
IT had a lame ending?
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
12:36:23 PM
Only if you call a preteen gangbang lame.

I kid. I kid.

god and the devil, good vs. evil, whatever
by Joenathan
Sep 17th, 2008
12:39:26 PM
label it what you will, they all come down to the same thing, especially in the genres we reference.

Bango... awesome, thats what I call it. Awesome. I was kind of upset they skipped that part in the mini-series. what a rip-off.
Joenathan
by Sailor Rip
Sep 17th, 2008
12:39:31 PM
Don't know about that but in The Dark Tower IV: Wizard and Glass the ka-tet do make a brief stop in Topeka, Kasas of the plague ravaged Earth of The Stand. There are cars backed up on the highway for miles and a roadsign has been spray painted "Captain Trips".
Fuck..
by Sailor Rip
Sep 17th, 2008
12:40:05 PM
...KaNsas.
IMAJICA FTW
by SpreadLegsNotWar
Sep 17th, 2008
12:42:45 PM
I wish someone would have the balls to make that into a mini-series on HBO or some shit.

And whatever happened to the Showtime mini-series for Weaveworld?

And for that matter, I also heard that someone is making The Damnation Game into a film. My guess is it will suck. Barker's twisted and beautiful prose has yet to be faithfully translated to film, this includes Hellraiser imho.

IFrank Darabont needs to get on this Stand miniseries by the way
by RockLobster800
Sep 17th, 2008
12:58:05 PM
I mean you knows its true...
by RockLobster800
Sep 17th, 2008
01:05:24 PM
they guy's King adaptations are the only ones that capture the spirit of the books properly, that keep the depth and integrity of the characters,makes the sad parts sad, the happy parts JUBILANT (see Shawshank)and the scary parts scary (The Mist)...plus he manages to keep the cheese and hammy acting well at bay and doesnt allow a low budget to make it look crap....consider now if the two decided to do an epic adaptation of the Stand...I mean, it has the potential to be perfect...and johnnygkprrupt, I hear ya-I remember everything about the summer I read the stand and It....
They should do a remake of The Stand...
by rev_skarekroe
Sep 17th, 2008
01:30:22 PM
...wherein Tom Cullen kicks ass.

Tom: M-O-O-N. That spells eat lead, motherfucker!

Flagg: NOOOOOO!!!!

Tom blasts Flagg with a sawed off shotgun. Roll credits.

I'm with spidercoz
by ironic_name
Sep 17th, 2008
01:33:44 PM
fuck this.
WHERE THE FUCK CAN I BUY THIS
by SpreadLegsNotWar
Sep 17th, 2008
01:38:13 PM
Don't tell me I actually have to go to a comic book store.
SpreadLegsNotWar
by rev_skarekroe
Sep 17th, 2008
01:44:52 PM
If you're too cool for funnybook stores, I imagine Barnes & Noble will have it. Assuming you're talking about the The Stand comic.
Rev
by SpreadLegsNotWar
Sep 17th, 2008
01:55:01 PM
It's not that I'm too cool, I'm fucking lazy. I'd much rather *add to cart* then hit up a store.
I think they sometimes cancel series...
by fiester
Sep 17th, 2008
01:55:22 PM
Just so they can put out a first issue of essentially the same series because they know it will sell big.
Not even King would say The Stand is greatest novel...
by fiester
Sep 17th, 2008
02:00:45 PM
...of the 20th Century. C'mon. I break it up into pre/post war.

Pre-war candidates would be: Joyce's Ulysses, Proust's À la recherche du temps perdu, Faulkner's The Sound and The Fury, and selected works of Kafka.

Post-war candidates would include: Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow, Rushdie's Midnight's Children, Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man, Nabokov's Lolita.

And, as always, I'm sure I left a few out. You always do when playing this game.

Stephen King Books that Go Boom
by symon
Sep 17th, 2008
02:17:18 PM
Stephen King is great at putting together these intricate, larger than life, impossibly tense plots ... but he doesn't know where to go with them. So in the end something blows up and that's that. Every new King book I read I cross my fingers there won't be an explosion at the end. (SPOILER WARNING) I loved that The Dark Tower didn't go there. For me, The Dark Tower saga is the best of Stephen King. It's his Great Work, as far as I'm concerned. But as far as best single book goes - I think it's Carrie. Read Carrie forgetting it's Stephen King and it's like you're reading a great novel, not just a great story. The Shining is a close number two, but again with the explosion...
SpreadLegs...
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
02:27:58 PM
If you're looking to pick it up on the net....Amazon, Milehighcomics, or midtowncomics. Or plenty of other places, but those are the three I get my comics from most often.... You'll pay more on Amazon, but it's a good place to go when something is sold out everywhere else.
King's single best novel
by fiester
Sep 17th, 2008
02:29:00 PM
Is probably The Dead Zone.
BangoSkank...
by SpreadLegsNotWar
Sep 17th, 2008
02:30:36 PM
I can't find it anywhere, Amazon, B&N, you name it.

Has it even hit the street yet?

Spread legs
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
03:07:06 PM
Go to Amazon, and use Captain Trips as the search description, it pops up no problem... I see that it is sold out at Midtown, however.
The Stand
by Jinxo
Sep 17th, 2008
03:19:12 PM
I don't think The Stand is the best book ever but there are bits of it that have stayed with me more than other books. Like when Nadine comes back to Larry so he can save her and he has to turn her away. There's a little life lesson there about why she really came back that has actually rang true in my real life.

And while The Stand miniseries is imperfect I do think a lot of the casting for it was amazingly spot on.

Here's my favorite Stand story that is uniquely mine. I'm reading the book. I'm towards the end when Stu and Tom Cullens are heading home from the final conflict. This will sound weird but for background music I had on a Weird Al cd. I just wanted something pop sounding but that I could tune out of a bit. The thing is, a tape or a record ends you here a distinct noise of some sort that signals they're done playing. A cd doesn't. Just goes quiet. So I'm reading and the Al cd goes quiet because, it would seem, it finished playing. Only it wasn't done. After...5 minutes of silence, by surprise up comes a bonus track of Al and his band just... shouting and making a huge amount of noise. Meanwhile I'm at a point in the book where Stu and Tom have stumbled into a creepy building filled with dead bodies... just as the unexpected screaming starts. It scared the crap out of me! I practically had to be peeled off the ceiling.
Er... wasn't the stand with Gary Sinise longer than ten hours?
by Lolthien
Sep 17th, 2008
03:20:12 PM
I mean.. it was a long ass miniseries right? Are you sure you went to pick it up? Did you watch it? Did it not last longer than two hours? Am I insane?
I read the Stand...
by Lord John Whorfin
Sep 17th, 2008
03:30:21 PM
on a road trip. My family was moving from San Diego to Boulder, CO. The Stand is not the greatest novel ever or of the last hundred years. Get a grip.
The Stand in the greatest novel of the 20th century?
by RobotDevil007
Sep 17th, 2008
03:30:24 PM
Don't read all that much, do we?
BangoSkank...
by SpreadLegsNotWar
Sep 17th, 2008
03:33:57 PM
Thanks, finally found it. I might wait until the whole series is out and pick up the compilation.
Spreadlegs...
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
03:43:08 PM
Cool. Not a problem.
The Stand mini was about six hours minus commercials
by Nasty In The Pasty
Sep 17th, 2008
03:43:46 PM
Jinxo
by steverodgers
Sep 17th, 2008
04:01:21 PM
Great story
If you believe that the Stand is the greatest novel
by hst666
Sep 17th, 2008
04:26:08 PM
of the 20th centuy, you need to read some more books. I like the Stand, although it suffers from an affliction many Stephen King novels did up through the mid-80s - the climax was abrupt and unsatisfying. Among Stephen King's work, I prefer It to the Stand.

Read Vonnegut, Chandler, Ellroy, Irving, and Tom Robbins, and then tell me the Stand is the greatest book of the 20th century.

I'd like to see a movie sequel to "the Mist".
by Smerdyakov
Sep 17th, 2008
04:48:54 PM
Where we could see what happened to the other people after they left the store, like Andre Braugher's character.
King
by Homer Sexual
Sep 17th, 2008
05:14:57 PM
Stephen King is, like many writers, someone who got much, much worse over time. He started strong with Salem's lot and Carrie. I'd say those are his two strongest works. Salem's lot is actually a scary book. Carrie is that rarity, a movie that outshines the book, but the movie is pretty much perfect and the book is still excellent.

Most people consider the next phase of his work to be the best, when he wrote Dead Zone, Stand, Shining and this period sort of ended with Christine. Those are all solid reads, but I wouldn't call any of them great. "It" was the last good book King wrote, almost but not quite ruined by an offensive and ridiculous conclusion.

Nowadays his writing is just so provincial and tiresome. And this tends to be even more apparent when limited-talented people such as Mick Garris adapt his work.

I don't think there is a need or a market to put any more of King's work onscreen, but the Stand might work very well as a long comic miniseries.

Three Things
by Continentalop
Sep 17th, 2008
06:35:28 PM
1) Greatest modern novel (last 30 years) is "Blood Meridian" in my opinion. And you can't start a list of great villains without including Judge Holden from that book. He is the epitome of evil (literally). 2) My favorite Stephen King novel is "Salem's Lot". Yeah, it is a vampire novel, but one freaky vampire novel. 3) My vote is for the amoral Lex Luthor. And my favorite Luthor is the one by John Byrne: no, not the evil CEO but the one with the Ultra-Humanite's brain inside his head from Generations. That was a great, evil Luthor. 2) My favorite Stephen King novel is "Salem's Lot". Yeah, it is a vampire novel, but one freaky vampire novel. 3) My vote is for the amoral Lex Luthor. And my favorite Luthor is the one by John Byrne; no, not the evil CEO but the one with the Ultra-Humanite's brain inside his head from Generations. That was a great, evil Luthor.
Never...
by Continentalop
Sep 17th, 2008
06:37:33 PM
Try to work and post something at the same time unless you want to screw it up. I also shouldn't try to walk and chew gum at the same time.
a sequel to The Mist...
by RockLobster800
Sep 17th, 2008
06:59:50 PM
if it continues the downward spiral of depression that the first one ended on, Im there! Seriously, loved the flick and liked the ending, but Jesus, they kick Tom Janes character when he's down...seriously they guy goes through stuff no man should face. It was so depressing I came out of the cinema laughing cos you dont know what to say to the person your with...I wonder what happened Darabont to go from the life affirming hope brimmed ending of Shawshank to...the Mist :S
Yeah tha tLex Luthor comic is pretty good...
by qweruiop
Sep 17th, 2008
08:06:07 PM
...got mine through milehighcomics for like 85 cents. Great look into the man's past. Imo the best interpretation of Lex is that of Birthright's, a powerful CEO who built his fortune from science/technology. Nice mix of the two. About the only thing I didn't like from this comic is that it had Lex when he was being depicted as hugely overweight. Imo the real Lex would never allow himself to get that huge. He's so vain about himself and his intelligence, that it's only natural that he keeps his body as fit as his mind in order to be above the "ants" below him.
re: RockLobster800
by hatemphd
Sep 17th, 2008
08:16:57 PM
maybe Darabont found the girl of his dreams before he started Shawshank... and his best man slept with her the day of his wedding while adapting The Mist.

That would do it. :p

Smallville had the best incarnation of Bizarro...
by guerillakarma
Sep 17th, 2008
08:19:58 PM
I liked your review of The Stand
by krushjudgement
Sep 17th, 2008
09:46:49 PM
but comic books are not a genre, they're a medium.
Dark Tower is the greatest King
by worldofwarcraft
Sep 17th, 2008
09:59:23 PM
Also probably my favorite stuff ever. But I've never read the last two installments. After reading Wolves ot Calla I was so disappointed , and I had a long serious think about wether I should continue on the path of the beam or not. On one hand I would see the Tower and do my best to remember the face of my father in the presence of the Crimson King. On the other hand I may just be walking into a big letdown that would forever soil my memory of one of the best reading AND life experiences I've ever had. ... Well, those books have been sitting on my shelf collecting dust, the whole set. It would be too heartbreaking for me if they sucked. Be like seeing Caroline Forger after all these years, and finding out that she was a complete mess of a woman.

by MikeTheSpike
Sep 17th, 2008
10:14:52 PM
I don't really have it in me to write a well-reasoned critique, and nobody is reading at this point, but let me just state for the record here that that issue of Deadpool was awful. Some serious doubt is cast upon those who praise it. Honestly, this is all that's required for you to say a comic is great? Literally - the Skrulls attack, Deadpool pops up and fights them (what he was doing there to begin with, I'd like to know), then offers to join them. The end. For $4? Get. Fucking. Real. PS: It's also not funny. And this pool-o-vision and conflicting narrative is just made-up bullshit that Way has pulled out of his ass, irrespective of the character's history.
Buzz Maverik's Evidence of Super Villainry
by Buzz Maverik
Sep 17th, 2008
10:51:32 PM
Superheroes do not exist but super villains might. Possible super-villain attacks: the stock market crash and Hurricaine Ike.
Continentalop
by BangoSkank
Sep 17th, 2008
11:47:03 PM
I agree that The Blood Meridian is the "best" novel written in the past 30 years. But, with The Stand turning the big 3-0 this year, it's still tied with Imajica as my favorite.

And I apologize to all the reviewers for helping turn this week's talkback into a literature focused discussion.....

Secret Invasion is bullshit
by Reelheed
Sep 18th, 2008
03:07:15 AM
Who can you trust? Pretty much everyone. Certainly every hero who has a book of their own. The main book is so badly written and the art so obviously rushed it makes me laugh. All those months of teases and mystery for what? Nick Furys grand plan - get a pack of heroes together in one of his handy crossover ready bunkers and then... shoot some skrulls. Inspired. Genius. Who is Captain Marvel? It doesn't matter we've killed him off. The heroes thoughtlessly zoom from one battle to the next and Reed Richards instantly figures out how to detect the Skrulls (off screen so as not to hurt our pea brains). Boring.
Thank You MikeSpike
by optimous_douche
Sep 18th, 2008
05:58:09 AM
For posting about something other than Stephen King.

I'll never begrudge the TBers their topic of choice, but this best novel crap is getting old.

Yes, you're all very smart and well read, now can we talk about comis for awhile?

I'm going with you part way on Deadpool Mike. I'm not quite as pissed as I think you are, but it was...let's say lacking.

I think it was from lack of dialogue. You can't deny that the action was definitely "brought" as the kids say. But I like Deadpool for his stream of sarcasm.

Not a bad start, but not the best effort I've read.

We're not all smart and well-read
by Laserhead
Sep 18th, 2008
07:27:07 AM
Just saying.

Hah.

All I ever want to talk about lately
by Laserhead
Sep 18th, 2008
07:28:31 AM
Is either Morrison's Batman or Brubaker's Captain America. That's it. Those two things seem to have pushed out all other comic-related topics in my head.
Buzz Maverik's Evidence of Super Villainry
by Buzz Maverik
Sep 18th, 2008
07:30:47 AM
Superheroes don't exist but super villains might. Possible super-villain attack: US embassy in Yemen. Surely even you clowns can see the connections here.
worldofwarcraft
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Sep 18th, 2008
07:36:16 AM
please finish the journey to CanKa' No Rey. I have been an avid King fan for about 20 years. The only thing I never took on was Roland and his Ka-tets journey. It seemed random and too wierd(Although I adore Barkers books of the Art). I finally took up the quest for the tower and finished about three weeks ago.....and you know what? It's the first book(or series ) that once I finished, I just went back to the start. I am know back at the Calla and couldn't be happier.
Secret Invasion.....
by BangoSkank
Sep 18th, 2008
08:20:46 AM
I'm a huge Marvel fan --HUGE fan-- and also a fan of a good crossover event.... but Secret Invasion is trying even my patience. Too much is going on. At first I dug that the backstory was being told in the New A and Might A books, but that's quickly grown stale. And what's worse, the main book is a complete mess. It feels like it should have been twice as long, a dozen issues or more, 'cause they're trying to cram WAY too much in. Also, I'm not going to buy every title that Marvel puts out, just so that I can understand what the fuck is going on. It would be one thing if they kept the main story to the Avengers titles, but they didn't. It's all over the friggin' place....
I bailed on SI
by optimous_douche
Sep 18th, 2008
08:47:30 AM
After issue 3. It's not taht it was bad, but once it "leaked" on how this was going to change the Marvel Universe, I just lost interest. I've enjoyed the cross-overs into my usual pulls and for me that is more than enough.

This is why i should never read Previews it just ruins the whole serial surprise nature of comics for me.

Of COURSE SuperVillains Exist Buzz!
by Psynapse
Sep 18th, 2008
09:41:42 AM
It's just that in THIS continuum we call them "Governments" and "Corporations".
"Reed Richards instantly figures out how to detect the Skrulls (
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
10:13:11 AM
Actually that was done on-screen in the first issue... the Hank-skrull shot him.

So, lets talk SI. I'm really interested in knowing exactly what WOULD satisfy you all. You've all said (at various points) that too much is happening and that not enough is happening, that it is too slow and that it is too fast. You decry the farming out of side stories to ancillary titles and then piss and moan that they're trying to put too much into the main title.

Where is the slack? I mean, isn't this a massive, years in the making, multi-title, multi-high level character cross over? What do you think is REALLY going to happen? Did you REALLY expect Tony Stark, star character of a recently minted billion dollar franchise, to turn out to NOT be who he says he is? Did you really think that was going to happen?

Really?

I don't think its fair to poo on a good, fun story for having to work within certain parameters (of which we are all aware of) that are completely beyond the creators' control. Why don't we all admit that comics are limited by the still fairly new, but much, much, much, infinately much more profitable multi-media end of its characters? Are you really sooooo disappointed that the heroes are going to "win". This isn't Wildstorm, people, the Marvel Earth is not going to be destroyed, eventually everything will return to a status quo, eventually, thats the nature of comics, so what would it take?

Lets start with the premiss that SI is a failure and not well executed (with which I strongly disagree, but for the sake of debate), sooooo what should have been done instead?

And the first guy to say "everything" is a friendless virgin bitter about his failure at life and his inability to the one thing he really, really wants to do because he has no talent and everyone knows it...
My Thoughts on SI
by optimous_douche
Sep 18th, 2008
11:32:19 AM
I guess I just don’t care. If everything is going to turn back to the status quo without any irrevocable changes, then what’s the point?

CRISIS on INFINITE EARTHS changed the landscape of DC, likewise HOUSE OF M forever changed mutants in Marvel. There needs to be a point if a story is not only going to hijack my monthlies, but also expects me to shell out extra duckets for a bunch of tie-in mini-series.

Hey, as much as I love DC, I hated the fact that there were no lasting repercussions from the death of Superman. I’m sitting around right now, wondering if FINAL CRISIS is truly going to change anything. “The day evil won”, for now perhaps, but in the long term. Doubt it. Right now, I see one character change (the return of Barry Allen) and one universe change (return of the multi-verse).

It needs to having lasting effects, otherwise it just feels like so much hype. If comics want to forget the past so easily and hit the reset button, then for God’s sake just do that.

Devil in "The Stand" tv movie = Huey Lewis evil twin
by JackRabbitSlim
Sep 18th, 2008
11:43:30 AM
Half expected him to say "I want a new drug" in a suitably demonic voice. As for the book - the explosion and resultant character deaths felt very much like a "Shit - i have waaay too many character threads - i can't write them all in a non biblical-length book - i need a device to kill a few of em off" moment. You could see the stitches holding the narrative fraying there - glimpses of Oz scrambling behind the curtain - irreparably took me out of the book.
SI
by Laserhead
Sep 18th, 2008
11:44:51 AM
The main drama being in back-story is tedious and gives a treading-water feel to the larger narrative, to me. Things that have already happened being put in scene rather than summary, whatever information is provided, gives it a stalled sense-- an effect of PADDING. The actual SI issues just aren't very exciting or imaginative to me; what can I say? It's dull and feels very, very, very much like a retread of very familiar tropes. Now that the Skrull-Cylons have invoked God, the Battlestar similarities are just outright ridiculous. I've decided that until he changes, I just don't think I like the way Bendis writes. The over-stylized dialogue which makes everyone speak with the same personality and cadences rings false and contrived, and more damning, to me, his actual plots are usually pretty dull in execution: something happens, people deliberate about what's happened and try out a couple things that don't work, then something else happens in the Nth hour that fixes things. He doesn't really know how to exploit drama like, say, Brubaker, or Ellis, or even Morrison and Millar. He has an idea, a general sense of its resolution, and then rather than actually plotting toward it, he seems to PAD the story with back-and-forth until its time for the resolution. There's a staleness and a general recycled feeling to the events, and in a lot of ways, outside Captain America, Marvel's universe is such a hodge-podge of status-quo-changing events that I find I just don't care about their characters in the way I used to. I can't help it, Iron Man, Spider-Man, New Avengers, Old Avengers-- it just seems like a big mess wherein the heroes don't behave with a continuity of personality, but toward the directives of the big event. You get little moments where somebody says something cool, but these things seem intertwined with boring stalls of banal talk. Now, I don't mean to defend DC with this, because Didio's buffoonery is inexusable, but it's just where I'm at with Marvel, and this was the last big event there I was going to take a look at. What should have been done better? Where do you start, and how deep do you go? I'd like better plotting, better pacing, better characterization, and a cleaner, more suspenseful story. I guess the first thing I'd have done different would be to get Brubaker to write it. Just my take. I don't care if others like it; Great, enjoy. I'd only been reading the issues in store, and think I actually bought one. But now, like optimus said, knowing where this is going to end up, I have no interest in even flipping through the remainder.
Optimus
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
11:48:43 AM
"I guess I just don’t care. If everything is going to turn back to the status quo without any irrevocable changes, then what’s the point?"

I appreciate the sentiment and understand what you're saying, but I don't think its entriely valid when referring to comics. I mean, this is comics, after all, the eventual return to status quo reboot is how they have always worked. I mean, just like you know Steve Rogers and Jean Grey will someday not be dead anymore, you can be just as sure that every comic story will eventually be ignored and retconned or glossed over or "solved" in favor of a return to status quo or a new Point Zero from which to begin a new journey. Right?

"There needs to be a point if a story is not only going to hijack my monthlies, but also expects me to shell out extra duckets for a bunch of tie-in mini-series."

Well, to be fair, SI hasn't finished yet and we aren't aware of what ALL the ramifications will be at this point, so lets just table this critisism for a future discussion once SI has wrapped up. (Unless of course you just want to admit that I'm right and you're wrong now... cause I'll accept that...)

"It needs to having lasting effects, otherwise it just feels like so much hype. If comics want to forget the past so easily and hit the reset button, then for God’s sake just do that."

Lets play a new game... Lets call it: "name the event/moment after... say... 1980, that is still considered relevant to day to day character universe life or has not been retconned."

Much like I treat continuity and the passage of time within comics, story relevance is tenuous at best. You just have to make peace with the fact that the character you love right now is only going to be that character RIGHT NOW, because in six months so new guy is going to get behind the wheel and he may just drive that son of a bitch straight into a brick. Let me ask you all: Anyone still excited about or even reading Iron Fist or Thunderbolts anymore? Comics, the character interpretations, the current storyline/continuity... its all transient and I think, at least, that comics are much easier to enjoy if your title choices and readings are just as fluid.
Just to be fair-- "The Day Evil Won"
by Laserhead
Sep 18th, 2008
11:53:12 AM
Does anybody else find that tag line ridiculous, because it's absolutely inconsequential, and readers know it? I mean, unless their universe is ended and DC folds up shop, then the fight ISN'T OVER. What the tagline MEANS is, "The Day Evil Won a Brief Battle in a Larger Ongoing War that Won't Actually End, Ever, And Don't Worry, Good Will Make a Stellar Comeback"
Best American 1900s novel = "Grapes of Wrath"
by JackRabbitSlim
Sep 18th, 2008
12:00:11 PM
And that's from a dyed-in-the-wool capitalist who can recognize greatness even when he doesn't agree (in fact vehemently disagrees) with the conclusions drawn. His dexterity with the language, the near-poetic structure of the narrative - that was some damn fine scribbling that pinko did.
Laser
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
12:09:28 PM
True. Bendis has a tendency to write in the same voice a lot, (remember the "Oh, no, you didn't" issue of New Avengers?) but this: "something happens, people deliberate about what's happened and try out a couple things that don't work, then something else happens in the Nth hour that fixes things." is way too over simplified to be a fair critique.

I defy you to come up with a similar type of story that CAN'T be broken down to such easy terms.

As for your characterization of the Marvel Universe, I guess we just disagree because I haven't felt like Marvel has been this cohesive and inter-related in years.

This though: "I'd like better plotting, better pacing, better characterization, and a cleaner, more suspenseful story." Come on, dude, come on, could you be more vague and whiny? You're better than that comic book guy cliched shit, I know you are. Saying that you would have preferred to see Bru's take, alright, I can get with that, its a stylistic thing for you, no problem, that's getting somewhere in the discussion, but vague whining... Come on, dude. Come on.
Laser's new tag line.
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
12:13:17 PM
God, spoil the ending, why don't cha?

Spoiler...
Fair Enough Joen
by optimous_douche
Sep 18th, 2008
12:15:17 PM
Even comics I have no interest in, I still hope people like them.

Why? becasue it keeps the medium going and at the end of the day that's what is really important.

I think most collectors will admit that if they stay with comic books long enough, they wax and wane between the two houses in their adoration.

No I don't expect anything that happens in books to be ever lasting, but good God give it a little time to stic. Hence why I respect House of M.

"but good God give it a little time to stic."
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
12:22:41 PM
But hasn't it?

How long ago was Disassembled? Isn't the SHRA still looming over the entire MArvel Universe? I'd say the only big Marvel Event that HASN'T had lasting universe wide effects is World War Hulk, although thats not even true because that story sent Herculeas into his own book and the God Squad storyline that directly affected SI. Its been what, four years, five years since all this started? Thats a lifetime in comics! How long do you need?
I have no problem wih the ending of The Stand...
by RockLobster800
Sep 18th, 2008
02:30:41 PM
I mean, I dont really know how people wanted it to end-a fist fight with Flagg? A war between Vegas and Boulder? I thought it ended kinda appropriatly, what with Larry finding his faith, Trashcan Mans attempts at redemptiions failing and all...I kinda thought the whole book was leading up to something apocalyptic like a nuclear bomb going off. But thats just me :S
I'm not whining, you asked
by Laserhead
Sep 18th, 2008
03:23:16 PM
And if that's vague, it's because I don't have the time or wherewithal to sit down with all the Bendis books I've read and haven't much liked and sift through every scene and make notations to illustrate my point. If I generalized too much with the progression of his plots, let me be more specific: His plots lack a suspenseful chain of causality. Once the problem is established, the large middle part of his stories often reads like it's inconsequential padding, irrelevant to the story's resolution, and his resolutions, to my mind, have never been satisfactory.
See? Thats more specific,
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
03:33:22 PM
I disagree though...
Optimous
by MikeTheSpike
Sep 18th, 2008
04:20:17 PM
The action in Deadpool, while very attractively-rendered, was a guy fighting Skrulls. If I had a dollar for every issue of a comic I've read in the past few months that featured a guy fighting Skrulls, I could retire right now. More power to him if Way wants to tie his book into the big event and boost sales, but he could at least take a page from Hercules and do it in an original manner.
Joenathan
by BangoSkank
Sep 18th, 2008
04:30:53 PM
My complaint was that in this last issue, too much is going on. Let's break it down.

You've got Marvel Boy's suicide-run out of nowhere. Who is this guy? Why is he doing what he's doing? I have no idea. I reread issue #5, and he was nowhere to be found. At some point I remember him escaping from prison, but that's all I got....

Then we have two pages of what's going on in the other books, none of which I'm reading, but it's a good outlook on the rest of the world, so I'm okay with it.

Then we've got the skrulls doing skrully shit. Again, okay.

Then we jump to the New and Mighty Avengers. Great! But only for two pages. Doh!

Then life on the streets.

Then the new Howling commandos, who I think are cool, but who are they again? Haven't seen much of them, not enough to know them, or really care. Again, two pages. They are joined by what's left of the Initiative (who I don't know) and the Young Avengers (who I've never followed either).

Then we've got one panel of the Hood's Gang. What are they up to? Who gives a fuck. They only get a panel or two per issue, if that.

Then we got the return of Thor. From where? No idea. Last I heard he was either dead, or a robot.

Then we've got the return of Captain America. I thought that mother-fucker was dead too... On top of which, he (whoever he might be) hasn't been mentioned in the books for months.

Then we've got the skrull army attacking, so of course....

The Avengers (both teams, who hate each other), join Dead Thor and Dead Captain America, with the Thunderbolts (who must have teleported in), the Howling Commandos (who did teleport in), and the Hood's crew (their sworn enemies).

I just feel like their spending full issues in the Avengers books detailing how one single skrull operative got on the inside, then jam three books worth of "real-time" action into one issue of SI. I also understand why all these people are banding together, but again, it's all done in one panel, or between panels.....

Just my humble-fuck of an opinion.

Let me add....
by BangoSkank
Sep 18th, 2008
04:40:41 PM
Please excuse the typos.
Bango
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
04:56:10 PM
Well, I can see where you might be confused, but honestly, to me, it seems like more of a case of you swimming in the deep end when you should be in the shallow section, not meant as an insult, what I'm saying is: judging by your detailed (I'm looking at you, Laserhead...) response, I don't think you're all that caught up on not just the ancillary SI stuff, but Marvel in general or you would know who Marvel Boy is, where he's been, where Thor's been and what he's been doing, where the Thunderbolts are, and do you really not know who's in the Cap costume at the moment?

so, because of all that, I can see why you'd feel confused, but to stretch my original metaphor a bit, if you want to swim in the deep end (read: the biggest event currentl going on at Marvel) you need to jump into the pool and swim around a bit (read more Marvel).

I know, I know, boo hoo, secret Invasion should be 100% accessible to the neophyte and diletant reader, well... its not. Hit up your local LCS, support the comic world and get caught up.
Also...
by Joenathan
Sep 18th, 2008
04:58:57 PM
your typos are excused.
JMS is writing a series with Thor and Bucky is now Cap
by hst666
Sep 18th, 2008
05:00:50 PM
Yeah....
by BangoSkank
Sep 18th, 2008
06:43:08 PM
In terms of me not knowing who Marvel Boy is, or what's up with Thor, or Cap, or whatever, that's valid.... But I guess, my thought is, if you're going to stuff all these people into the same book, touch on them individually a bit more....

I was being a bit facetious in regard to my lack of knowledge.... I know that Thor is back out there, and someone else had stepped in as Cap.... But, although it's a company wide crossover, at its heart I still see it as an Avengers story. Cap and Thor are major Avenger's players who haven't gotten any mention in the team books since thier return. AND, if the big reveal of their return to the Avengers is going to take place in SI, give it more than a single splash page. Make it the big deal it should be.

And my main complaint isn't really that I don't know the names of The Young Avengers, or even who Marvel Boy is... It's how condensed this last issue felt. Instead of committing an entire issue to how Pym got replaced by a skrull (months ago) in New Avengers, give me more of what's going on right now....

And yes, I'm probably missing this desired action in the comics that I don't follow.... but my ass has been burned by Marvel before. World War Hulk being a prime example of me picking up comics I don't normally read and getting a ton of unnecessary fluff. World War Hulk:X-men and similar crap is the reason why I'm not going out of my way to spend extra cash on SI.... maybe I'll pick up the trades and reread it all later.

MikeSpike Deadpool
by optimous_douche
Sep 19th, 2008
06:55:25 AM
I have to wonder if the tie-in to the Skrulls was a Way choice, or an editorial mandate.

I don't think any writer at this point wants to be part of a tie-in unless they are running the direction of it.

After watching Morrison get F'd over by all the pre-crap that tainted Final Crisis, I think all creators are now wary of editors.

Buzz Maverik's Evidence of Super Villainry
by Buzz Maverik
Sep 19th, 2008
07:16:35 AM
Supeheroes don't exist, put supervillains might.

Possible supervillain attack: poison Chinese dairy products.

I suspect Fu Manchu, Wu Fang, or even Lo Pan the Shadow Emperor.

Surely, even you clowns can see the connections here.

Are Crossovers/Epic Events for the Casual Reader?
by optimous_douche
Sep 19th, 2008
08:02:39 AM
While the question is not as old as whether Greedo or Han shot first, this debate on how many title you need to read to truly understand universe changing event books has been a focal point for the better part of twenty years in the comic collecting community.

From a wide-eyed, utopian, child-like perspective every comic book should be accessible to a new reader walking in the first time. Whether the exposition is force fed through an intro paragraph or delicately weaved into the opening panels of the book, ideally the writer should get the reader up-to-speed so they can revel in the next 20 to 22 pages.

Well, excuse me while I remove the pixie-dust from ass and get grounded back in reality.

This is not an idealistic world and for a book to be truly epic it should transcend and touch upon almost every book within that universe. As we look at a Secret Invasion and Final Crisis it is naïve to think that we will get the full picture from merely the titles that bare those singular names.

Now, I bailed on SI, simply because I did not “get” what was going-on in the grand scheme of things. Why? Frankly, I just don’t read that many Marvel titles. This is hhardly Marvel or Bendis’ fault. I have never cared for the Avengers, the galactic titles do little to titillate me and my love affair with Spider-Man over the years runs as hot and cold as his relationship with the Osborn clan. I’m a mutant guy and quite frankly my interest in mutants just did not provide enough continuity fodder for me to become truly immersed in the pages of SI. I will say however, I loved the bleed of SI into tiltes like X-Factor and She-Hulk. David balanced the content beautifully between what I know about these stories without ever getting heavy handed on the SI tie-in. What I remembered from the first three issues of SI that I had read melded beautifully into these books.

Now, Final Crisis I can speak to. There are a scant few books in the DC universe that I have not read over the past three years. Is this a beautiful cross-over or epic event? No, far from it. Reading Final Crisis as a solitary book is enjoyable, but the cross pollination into other titles feels as though as it has been handled by a swarm of retarded bees. This is counting the lead-up books as well as the books churning out during the throes of the main-event. But at least I can say I understand what is going on…sorta.

From my unlearned opinion I will say that marvel seems to be taking the cake by keeping tight control on events no matter what your ultimate feelings are about the books. From my learned perspective DC has not accomplished this. In the end though, these books should not be viewed as solitary stand-alone titles, that’s why certain books are deemed monthlies and others get the coveted title of cross-over event.

I confess...
by Psynapse
Sep 19th, 2008
08:42:28 AM
I'm utterly and completely bored by both FC and SI. But then, I've decided that when the current Buffy monthly and DC's 'Darkest Night' event are over I'm cancelling my (now 18 year old) subscription at the LCS and joining the ranks of the trade waiters. The hassle of managing the longboxes along with the sense of being fleeced repeatedly by the big 2 has made me realize my money is really better spent elsewhere for all I want to accomplish in my personal life. YES, I AM jaded and cynical at this point, but that's besides the point. The bigger and more important question is do you really think I'm a minority in this attitude? And ask yourself what that says for this medium and industry as whole?

Event fatigue? If only it were JUST that.....

The jaded minority and Bangoskank
by Joenathan
Sep 19th, 2008
09:34:59 AM
Yes, I do think you're in the minority, most of those who are a readily admitted part of this group only think they are a large section of comics demographics because they surround themselves with like minded people, i.e. the message boards. The plain, simple and irrefutable fact is, sales are banging along, man, so unless every single one of you are lying and actually buying the things you claim you don't, (a distinct possibility) there a shit ton of mother fuckers out there who are loving every minute of the Big 2 and buying the hell out of them or at the very least, they're buying the hell out of them and having better things to do then to come on-line and complain about it.

I'll agree, having finally read it, theat 6 wasn hurried, but I think that was to free up the last two for the resolution, don't you? Also, Thor and Cap may have been Avengers at past points (technically, the current Cap hasn't, but you understand...), currently they ARE NOT members, sooooo if SI isviewed as an Avengers' book, then it makes sense that they do not appear that much, right?
And really...
by Psynapse
Sep 19th, 2008
09:39:12 AM
$2.99-3.99 a book? Compared on average to other monthly periodicals (relative to both page count and production costs) we (comics readers) ARE being fleeced by just about every publisher of comics there is. Given the current economic environment and the steady erosion of disposable income, monthlies have simply become too cost prohibitive.
Right on, Optimus
by Joenathan
Sep 19th, 2008
09:47:47 AM
I think that is what defines the events as EPIC, the fact that they cover the whole universe, so you have to be more than passingly familiar for MAXIMUM enjoyment. A number 1 issue, sure, that should be all reader friendly, but an epic universe sprawling event, thats for veterans, by fact of the build up to said event alone, its just for veterans. If you read the main book alone, it should be fun, I agree, but you don't really see the whole thing unless you spread out a little more. I'm the opposite of you. I'm reading FC alone and sprawled all over SI. I'm having fun with both.
We'll see....
by Psynapse
Sep 19th, 2008
10:04:55 AM
Given the current economic turmoil (Hey! let's use Taxpayer funding to bail out the private sector yet again!) I think you're going to see quite the shift in sales numbers over the next 3 years.....(Anyone who doesn't think that such situations drasticly affect luxury industries simply hasn't been alive long enough or hasn't paid attention these last 30 years)
Actually...
by Joenathan
Sep 19th, 2008
10:11:07 AM
What drops are things like vacations or new cars, things like movies, books, or dare I say, comics all rise because of their "relatively" low price, close proximity and escapism entertainment value. All that being said, though: comics aren't slumping, especially not after this year, what with the billion dollar comic book movie franchises and all.
Not to belabor a point.....
by BangoSkank
Sep 19th, 2008
10:14:10 AM
But I'm far from a casual reader --Marvel Zombie for 25 years here-- and I may have shot myself in the foot when making my complaint about the latest issue of SI, and mentioning all the characters that I'm not up to date on.

In reality, my complaint is that I feel like the core-book, SI, feels over-packed with action, while what I see as the two "main" ancillary books --New and Mighty-- feel a bit on the light side.

The same plot-point they took an entire issue with, Hank Pym's defection/realization of the Skulls failings, they also made with Skull-Captain Marvell in four or five well paced pages spread out over two issues.

My other complaint is the Marvell Boy suicide attack out of nowhere. If this was set up in another comic, then it shouldn't have been the opening in the latest SI.... It's not even mentioned in the front page recap. And all I want is a little insight into character motivation. That's something I should need to read an entire other book for.

Despite all my bitching, I really am enjoying the story overall. Just wanted to vent a little.

That's something I *shouldn't*
by BangoSkank
Sep 19th, 2008
10:18:44 AM
need to read an entire other book for.

Oops.

Joenathan
by BangoSkank
Sep 19th, 2008
10:24:26 AM
"...but I think that was to free up the last two for the resolution, don't you?"

And that's exactly my point. Why force a story that has twelve or fifteen issues of action into eight. Either cut some plot or extend the core SI book.

And I don't think that have the "gall" to criticize a comic I love is the same as being jaded.

I gotta get some work done....
by BangoSkank
Sep 19th, 2008
10:27:37 AM
but will be back later.
Which Marvel Boy did they kill off?
by SleazyG.
Sep 19th, 2008
12:57:33 PM
Wacky Grant Morrison early-90's Marvel Boy? Or old-school 1950's AGENTS OF ATLAS Marvel Boy? And did he actually die, or is "suicide run" not to be taken literally?
Bango and Marvel Boy
by Joenathan
Sep 19th, 2008
02:21:31 PM
The "jaded" part of that post was to you, sorry for any confusion. The second half the post was to you. I realized after posting that I didn't label them and of course, once again, no edit function, so...

Anyway, they didn't kill off Marvel Boy, they're finally doing something with him and this was started back in the illuminati series, the illuminati tried to get him to embrace his "legacy" as a hero instead of waging war on the World, its all about making him the "new" captain marvel. Morrison's series is really fun, with J.G. Jones art, you should check it out if you haven't read it. Its one from the more coherant side of Grant Morrison, if that motivates you more...

I've really been enjoying the Mighty and New installments, I think they're fun. The new Howling Commandos getting trained and kidnapping MAria Hill... pretty cool...

Look, I get what you're saying, I'm never going to argue that these Events are perfect, they're always a bit over stuffed and unweildy, personally, I always feel like they should be doubl sized books and with a few more issues so that they have enough room, Civil War is an especially good example of not having enough room, I think. Character moments are often inferred or lost rather than played out and I wish that wasn't the case, because I'm willing to pay extra to see it all, but what can you do? Comics, by their nature of static, sequentail art can be imperfect when it comes to subtle nuiances, especially with such huge, crazy superhero stuff like this. Add that to the art of balancing so many creators and characters and their concerns, the big events will never be as good as the single creator driven title. I give events like SI more of a pass, because I feel that getting on them for not spending enough time with the characters is like pointing out how retarded the plot to Transformers was. Duh, you know?
I must disagree JoeNathan
by Homer Sexual
Sep 19th, 2008
03:01:59 PM
I know we've discussed this before, and my big beef continues to be that next to no one of substance is a skrull. As the man said "Who can you trust?" Pretty much everybody. The reveals are all second tier characters.

I have to say that pretty much any character could be a skrull, because the "real" hero could then return at the end of SI. This is why I initially expected Cap and Stark to both be skrulls. So many people dislike the portrayal of Stark as patriot/fascist that his exposure as a skrull who initiated Civil War to disrupt the Marvel Universe seemed very logical and likely. The whole New Mutants/Nitro thing, they could all have been skrulls. I was expecting lots of skrulls, and there have been very few. I know this is repetitive, but it is what really limits my enjoyment of SI, even though I do like it.

I heart Tony... big time.
by Joenathan
Sep 19th, 2008
03:50:34 PM
I do, I think what they're doing with Iron Man now has finally made him interesting and elevated him above the one note existence as the ex-drunk super hero.

I also think they've fought too hard to establish Tony as a 3-D character to risk all that work by making him as a skrull. Wouldn’t that seem like a cheat to you after everything they’ve done up to now? It would to me.

Thor? Might hurt JMS's story.

Cap? That might ruin Bru's story.

Spider-man? Talk about a mine field there. Hasn’t he been fucked with enough lately?

Reed? Well, maybe, but in the context of the story it wouldn’t really work.

The rest of the Fantastic Four? Obviously by shunting them into the negative zone, what they’re really saying is: We’re not going to use these characters to any consequence.

It'd be cool if Nick Fury was one, but then, why? Like Reed it really wouldn’t work in the context of the story. It wouldn’t make any sense. “Ha-HA! I’m actually a skrull!” “…but why did you train us how to kill skrulls then?” “Uh… shut up!”

Wolverine, you could probably get away with it, what with his history of scrambled pasts and implants and yadda, yadda, yadda, but really, after examining why the others wouldn't work and only having Wolverine left as the last possible "big name" to make a skrull, he kind of becomes the Mace Windu of the possibilities, right?

I still say Hank Pym is a huge character. Also, after the last five years, I think Spiderwoman is also a BIG reveal. So yeah, it’d be cool if there had been more, but eventually we’d just be at this point anyway, all the heroes, ready to charge.
Buzz Maverik's Suspects In Super Villainry
by Buzz Maverik
Sep 19th, 2008
04:06:03 PM
Local mayhem: Barfin' Ralph Upchuck; also the UAO (United Anarchists Organization)

Global assaults: Dr. Sirroco

Cosmic terror: Collapstar

Meanwhile...
by loodabagel
Sep 19th, 2008
10:52:40 PM
I didn't read Secret Invasion or a Stephen King novel. I just read the last issue of All-Star Superman and kindly accepted that it was the best Superman comic EVER.
I wish I had a ton of money...
by loodabagel
Sep 19th, 2008
11:06:47 PM
I managed to read the first three issues of Secret War and found them pretty good. (infinitely better than Civil War) I wish I could honestly say Marvel has their best crossover in years (Maybe ever?) but I haven't been there. Maybe if a deluxe trade comes out that collects all the main issues and tie-ins in order. Still, just from reading talkbacks, Secret Invasion seems pretty good. Nobody's complaining about characterization or late shipping. Has Marvel finally got their shit together? Only time will tell.
nothing on All Star Superman 12?
by Amadeus Zero
Sep 20th, 2008
10:36:26 PM
Been waiting months for this last issue of a great series, and nothing?! (sigh) Next week?
C'mon!
by loodabagel
Sep 23rd, 2008
04:13:06 PM
Let's get some more posts up in here!
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.